Does the TikTok bill pave the way for a "Great Firewall of the USA"?
However, “application” is defined as “a website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application”.
This part deeply worries me. It is one thing to force Apple or Google Play not to offer a particular app on the app store. But in order to prevent a website from being “distributed” the government would need to create a large piece of technical infrastructure that filters and censors all web traffic coming to the US - akin to the “great firewall of China” or the separate internet that Russia is starting to build.
No one seems to be talking about this, but given the strangely eager 50:0 vote on the issue, I’m wondering if this might be the motivation behind it?
You can find the full text of the bill here:
https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20240311/HR%207521%20Updated.pdf
17 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 44.9 ms ] threadThere are three conditions (i) (ii) (iii).
It clearly prevents foreign adversaries from operating relatively large social media site, no matter how it is implemented.
This is not "by all means necessary" type issue. It the only enforcement is monetary penalties under civil law. AG has option to seek even more declaratory and injunctive reliefs if $500 per user is not enough.
What do they do with foreign "app stores"? What do they do with websites?
If you can download and install an application from any website (as was the standard approach in 90s and 2000s), such censorship (be it corporate of governmental) would not be possible.
Once again ..
"It's not that they're wicked or naturally bad
It's knowing they're foreign that makes them so mad!"
Flanders and Swann
But somehow law enforcement started using it on domestic targets.
Look at FISA 702, it again is supposed to target foreigners, but they use it as a way to snoop on Americans.
I fear this bill will be used the same way.