JWT confirms something is seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe (livescience.com) 31 points by smackay 2y ago ↗ HN
[–] mgreenw 2y ago ↗ Are we sure they verified the claims in that JSON Web Token? [–] bigyikes 2y ago ↗ It matches what we’ve seen from Hubble for some time. JWT verified Hubble. [–] alemanek 2y ago ↗ Woosh [–] mgreenw 2y ago ↗ ‘Twas a joke about JSON Web Tokens _sigh_Note: my original comment said “JWT” [–] Sirizarry 2y ago ↗ It’s okay, I had a good chuckle [–] ironSkillet 2y ago ↗ The article is about how JWT agrees with independent Hubble telescope measurements. Both disagree with a 3rd measurement that theoretically should be in agreement. Therefore, the theory is obviously wrong/incomplete in a measurable way.
[–] bigyikes 2y ago ↗ It matches what we’ve seen from Hubble for some time. JWT verified Hubble. [–] alemanek 2y ago ↗ Woosh [–] mgreenw 2y ago ↗ ‘Twas a joke about JSON Web Tokens _sigh_Note: my original comment said “JWT” [–] Sirizarry 2y ago ↗ It’s okay, I had a good chuckle
[–] mgreenw 2y ago ↗ ‘Twas a joke about JSON Web Tokens _sigh_Note: my original comment said “JWT” [–] Sirizarry 2y ago ↗ It’s okay, I had a good chuckle
[–] ironSkillet 2y ago ↗ The article is about how JWT agrees with independent Hubble telescope measurements. Both disagree with a 3rd measurement that theoretically should be in agreement. Therefore, the theory is obviously wrong/incomplete in a measurable way.
[–] mckirk 2y ago ↗ I thought JavaScript becoming the de-facto standard language for the web even on the back-end had already proven that. [–] cowmix 2y ago ↗ Is this a comment on how one must use Javascript to program the JWST?
10 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 34.6 ms ] threadNote: my original comment said “JWT”