US standards body says ByteDance researcher wrongly added to AI safety groupchat (reuters.com) 8 points by lnguyen 2y ago ↗ HN
[–] brevitea 2y ago ↗ To be sure, there was a former Apple employee and a former Google employee held liable for data exfiltration. But ByteDance is the risk. Okay.Edit: To all the downvoters, check facts vs. hysteria. You know, cuz science and facts and data and evidence and truth values. [–] yodon 2y ago ↗ >check facts vs. hysteriaWould love to. Have a citation to guide in that process? [–] brevitea 2y ago ↗ Of course. Where would you like to start? Mis/Disinfo campaigns, cognitive biases, review of scientific method?
[–] yodon 2y ago ↗ >check facts vs. hysteriaWould love to. Have a citation to guide in that process? [–] brevitea 2y ago ↗ Of course. Where would you like to start? Mis/Disinfo campaigns, cognitive biases, review of scientific method?
[–] brevitea 2y ago ↗ Of course. Where would you like to start? Mis/Disinfo campaigns, cognitive biases, review of scientific method?
[–] sergers 2y ago ↗ It's not clear who added the bytedance researcher to slack as a volunteer.I would more question what they were doing in violation of the consortium rules inviting the employee, than that employee joining.
5 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 20.0 ms ] threadEdit: To all the downvoters, check facts vs. hysteria. You know, cuz science and facts and data and evidence and truth values.
Would love to. Have a citation to guide in that process?
I would more question what they were doing in violation of the consortium rules inviting the employee, than that employee joining.