+1 endorsement for me. I run a kubernetes cluster on a set of dedicated servers for some years now with Rancher and love it. All my team are very productive with it!!
Are you running Rancher with rke2? I checked like 9 month ago and gave up again on rancher for managing my rke2 setup as it still had too many features missing / was not really usable
We have been running RKE2 for a few years now never had any major issues or anything missing that wasn't possible to add with a helm chart. The only thing we changed with the most recent cluster is disabled the built-in CNI/kube-proxy and installed cillium instead, since calico very occasionally gave kube-proxy issues.
Multi-Cluster: With Rancher Prime you can automate processes and enforce consistent security policies across all clusters, regardless of their location.
Support: Rancher Prime lifecycle provides an 18 month lifecycle complete with support, security patches and maintenance updates.
7 comments
[ 2.2 ms ] story [ 20.9 ms ] threadI'm happy with rke2, but rancher the ui is my 'issue'.
It works well for rke1 but it took ages until it even started talking rke2
Multi-Cluster: With Rancher Prime you can automate processes and enforce consistent security policies across all clusters, regardless of their location.
Support: Rancher Prime lifecycle provides an 18 month lifecycle complete with support, security patches and maintenance updates.
https://www.rancher.com/products/rancher-platform has more details on the complete Rancher platform.