> Accounts controlled or administered by the user have posted or sent more than 1,000 pieces of content, whether text, images, audio, or video, that are found to be 90 percent or more likely to contain content generated by artificial intelligence, as assessed by the platform using state-of-the-art tools and techniques for detecting AI-generated content.
This appears to impose a requirement to purchase the services of AI detection tools on any site that wants to allow users to remain anonymous.
My state has a huge political problem right now with the state going unchecked. It’s really hard to push back ridiculous bills like this because the Dems control everything. The way these asinine bills get killed is public pressure, lawsuits, or getting signatures to put out to a state vote.
The people in Sacramento do not represent the state population. The people in Sacramento are using the state as a petri dish for other progressives in other states to copy the model if bills work out.
First, they'll come for those who post more than 1000 pieces of content.
And I did not speak out because I don't post more than 1000 pieces of content.
Then they'll come for those who post more than 100 pieces of content.
And I did not speak out because I don't post more than 100 pieces of content.
Then they'll come for those who post more than 10 pieces of content.
And I did not speak out because I don't post more than 10 pieces of content.
Then they'll come for me because of a single comment.
And there is no one left to speak out for me.
4 comments
[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 19.7 ms ] threadThis appears to impose a requirement to purchase the services of AI detection tools on any site that wants to allow users to remain anonymous.
The people in Sacramento do not represent the state population. The people in Sacramento are using the state as a petri dish for other progressives in other states to copy the model if bills work out.