Ask HN: Google Drive vs iCloud – which is best for personal files/photos/videos?
I'm an iPhone/mac user (no iCloud for photo/videos, just contacts and a few very small things that makes moving to a new iPhone easier). But I also use Google Drive a lot.
I'm from a country with terribly slow upload speeds, and I've got 10 days in a country with high upload speeds, so I'll try to make a decision soon.
For a fairly important decision, I find surprisingly little useful comparisons online.
The most useful has been a youtube comment [1]:
> The biggest difference is that iCloud is a sync service, whereas Drive is a backup and sync service. Being able to store things and delete them from your device while still having the option to sync specific folders across devices makes Drive superior to both iCloud and OneDrive.
This makes me lean toward google drive.
Your thoughts one this are greatly appreciated.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=794VnvYuJ5c
26 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 76.9 ms ] threadSure a declined/canceled/expired credit card might be less likely. But I wouldn’t bet on it over a few years. Much less several decades.
Good luck.
I'd consider paying 10 years in advance if I could tbh.
Suppose you get issued a replacement credit card number and forget to update all your online accounts?
The cloud provides convenience, but it does not care about your photos as much as you do.
The best way to preserve pictures is printing them out and putting the prints in a box. It has a track record.
CD-R is the best digital format for archiving.
Now you move to image degradation, risk of loss to fire, water, etc
On the other hand I’ve had many dozens of declined/replaced/expired credit cards. Some have glitched online transactions.
I have also been laid up sick and recovered from surgery. Eventually I will die. Maybe my online accounts will be continuously maintained. Maybe not.
The shoebox of pictures will still be there in the closet even if I stopped thinking about it many years before. And it will be easy for someone to know what it is. A bill for $10/month is the kind of thing executors get rid of.
The cloud is great for access. But it is fragile. In the end it’s all Geocities, just at scale.
Random shoe boxes of thousands of photos will get chucked by the executors - no one has time to go through them
No one cares
So ... if you're only worried about them maybe surviving your passing, don't worry: they're all going to the great dustbin in the sky (or in the front yard)
Nothing critical has to happen next month and every month thereafter. There's no financial tradeoff to be considered. No need to doom scroll at a computer.
And if there is something that speaks to them, they can hang it on the wall. If you don't print, you don't really care that much about the pictures anyway. There's nothing wrong with that, making pictures is fun.
And now you have to store hundreds of CDs somewhere in a climate-controlled manner
You're gonna get what ... 100 (maybe? probably more like 50-60 (if they're high-quality images)) photos per CD? Say you [only] have a 1000 photos - you need 10-20 CDs
Ramp that number up to what seems to be a lot more common (say 100+ "keepers" per month), and you're burning a CD every month just to keep pace, or about a dozen a year
And that is just photos - haven't gotten into video yet (an increasingly-common file type)
Then you also need a way to read them later (integral CD/DVD drives are not especially common any more on most systems - so you also need to keep extra hardware handy)
And that external hardware is going to need devices that connect to it - USB-A is still pretty common ... but it's becoming less so
Anyone remember Firewire? SCSI? I do ... but they have all gone the way of the dodo bird
CDs degrade over time - commercially-produced less than home-burned...but they're distinctly not permanent media
If you move to DVD-R, you expand the number of images you can store from ~50-100 per disc to ~400-800 ... so you're burning one (just for photos) every quarter to half year - just to keep up
Or you can pay Apple $10/mo for 2TB[0] of storage
Or BackBlaze a $100/year[1] for "unlimited" storage (there's a limit somewhere ... but it's pretty high) for a single user
If you want to run your own archiving service/process ... be my guest (I do it by running NextCloud on a server) - but it is not for everyone (I also pay for OneDrive via my 365 subscription and the 2TB iCloud service for all our family devices (laptops, iPads, iPhones))
---------
[0] https://support.apple.com/en-afri/108047
[1] https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-backup/pricing
I run an instance
But you're still paying for the space (and, if you're like me, also the server infrastructure to run it (and spending time keeping it up-to-date, etc))
I haven’t seen this mentioned much on HN (perhaps because it’s relatively new, an opt-in feature, and not open-source), but iCloud offers E2EE for most of its services. Of course, one has to implicitly trust Apple’s implementation as I don’t believe this is auditable by independent sources. Would love somebody more knowledgeable than me in this topic chiming in!
FWIW I use iCloud, but as a sync service so I can access files on iPad and iPhone.
The reason I prefer google drive / iCloud is (I think) they have backups so if a truck or a comet hits one of their data centers, my files probably won't be lost.
Whereas I don't think that's true of S3. Perhaps someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think with AWS/GCP it's up to the user to manage redundancy.
My view is that Google Drive and iCloud will cost significantly more, but that is getting you a nice web interface where you can see your files. And maybe other features like sync’ing. Also, customer support.
I like AWS S3 because I trust my data is more secure there and it is much cheaper. I also trust the durability of s3, not sure that Google Drive or iCloud discloses so openly how they replicate data or if they have an SLA like S3. But S3 takes some technical knowledge to understand how to manage things in a cost effective way. And you won’t get help from AWS support unless you pay for a support plan.
Also the person you are responding to is obviously wrong. S3 is the most durable of all. iCloud and Dropbox were using S3 at some point.
I use iCloud and Adobe Lightroom. In LR, I make sure that it keeps full resolution photos on a removable drive. Then I back up that drive to a NAS once week or so. Backup folder on NAS is mounted only during backup.