Ask HN: Will you switch back if Windows on Arm becomes as snappy as macOS?
Title field is limited, but the full question is: If you were a former Windows user who switched to macOS for its snappiness, will you consider switching back to Windows if a future Arm processor finally makes Windows as snappy as macOS?
27 comments
[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 73.3 ms ] threadhas nothing to do with the CPU btw
Windows 11 on my i5-12600K already feels snappier than macOS on my M3 Max on a day to day basis. The M3 Max only really shines when I’m doing local LLM stuff or engaging in long-term processor intensive tasks.
I favor macOS because it’s a UNIX-like OS and I find it less user-hostile.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/12/24128640/microsoft-window...
Mac OS always feels a bit sluggish to me, especially with the slow animations, but so does windows nowadays.
There are lots of problems with windows nowadays and personally speaking, snappiness/OS resource usage isn’t at the top of my list of concerns.
MacOS isn’t superior in every technical aspect, but it is in many.
Also, I highly doubt high performance ARM would magically make windows faster and more efficient. I also have a relatively high end desktop workstation and windows doesn’t feel noticeably faster there and it’s also not meaningfully more resource efficient. Fedora KDE on the same machine feels significantly snappier than windows, or my modern MacBook with Apple silicon
Assuming you take good care of your equipment and don't need to upgrade often, I'm guessing this could take many years, probably a decade.
My last decent Windows machine was a Lenovo T530. That thing was a workstation and didn't pretend to be anything else. Modular, easy to replace components, that thing got out of my way and just worked. That was over a decade ago.
After that I had nothing but irritating issues. Everything from poor wifi (looking at you Killer), poor battery life (2 hours max), ventilation issues and overheating, etc. Example: My Dell XPS with InfinityEdge screen looked amazing. What was less amazing was the constant BSODs on a brand new machine within a few months of light usage.
I switched to a MBP Max M1 and haven't looked back.
I am not a gamer and I don’t find .net or anything adjacent interesting. I don’t run anything on windows.
So no I wouldn’t ever use windows because I don’t care for it.
I’ve also never worked somewhere where we didn’t use Macs.
The benefit of going to ARM is reduced power use for tasks that are predictable. Apple silicon is basically chips optimized for general use case of Macbooks (typing text, web browsing, video content). For things like gaming or other intensive tasks that require a lot more branching, the efficiency drops. It still edges out a little bit because the compilers do end up optimizing parts of the programs a bit, but then again, because of Rices theorem, this is never a guarantee across all things and compatibility can be an issue.
As far as OS go, Windows is the best all in one if you have a good desktop. You get WSL2 which works well for all dev stuff, you get better monitor support, and you get access to software that is only available for Windows.
For laptop, its hard to beat a lightweight linux distro with i3wm once you get used to it.
I feel that macOS is unfortunately getting out of hand with telemetry as well.
Plus there are going to be drive letter names and problem with using "prn" as a file name, and other Windows nonsense that should have died a flaming death decades ago.
Mac's are much better for media creation, nothing compared to Final Cut Pro and Logic.
Windows is better for gaming, plus I can dual boot Linux. Windows would be the better OS if Microsoft could stop trying to inject adds. Mac's don't feed you tabloid news.
I'm skeptical ARM Windows will be good. I think the laptops will be overpriced to the point you might as well buy a MacBook
I switched when Apple was still using PPC. I’ve been through 3 architectures and the transitions have been largely seamless for me. Microsoft seems to make much more trivial things seem like a pain. I’m not sure why I’d ever want to go back to that. Microsoft requires 1-2 decades of trust building with me.