I only see four confirmed cases and one fabrication. Is that really the entire confirmed scope of this? The way Reddit talks about it, it was thousands.
Well I wouldn’t be surprised if Reddit commenters didn’t have all the facts, but certainly four cases is horrific and far too many. This absolutely never should have happened, and one wonders, if we have four confirmed cases, were there additional unknown cases? And how else did the Saskatoon police treat indigenous people? Why did other police stand for such behavior?
There’s plenty of questions to ask if you consider for a moment the implications of police murdering people at will.
Edit: The “Censorship attempts” section of the Wikipedia page is informative as well, and shows that someone inside the police department attempted to delete mention of these events on a Wikipedia page about the police force. We might ask: do they have a habit of erasing information related to their crimes?
I can’t base my world view around guesswork like this. Four confirmed cases is four confirmed cases and that’s that.
It’s just like how people see ten murders by blacks on the news and assume all blacks are murderers. No, that’s just ten black murders and nothing more.
native racism in the prairie provinces has been awful. in alberta indigenous population appx 7% but inmate population appx 50%. saskatchewan and manitoba likely similar.
That stat alone doesn't tell us if the disparity is due to different rates if criminal behavior, or different treatment by the system. A useful check is to look at murder victimization rates, since a) murder is almost always reported, and b) most murders are intra-racial.
The doc you linked says 39% of inmates are First Nations, and this[0] says they are 37% of Alberta murder victims.
Of course this isn't saying that there isn't inequality in the system, but just that happens before someone gets sentenced.
But that’s unrelated to the “racism” comment above. European Canadians came and destroyed the indigenous Canadian population, scattered their population and upended their societies. But Canadians today might treat indigenous people without any prejudice.
Generally speaking, crime isn’t a matter of economics. My dad’s village in Bangladesh in the 1950s—when 1/4 of kids died before the age of five—was safer then than Toronto is today.
Also culture, socialization, and community structure (which may also be the result of historical events).
“Socioeconomic factors” by themselves have limited explanatory potential. Even the poorest Canadian reservations are wealthier per capita than India is now or China was a few years ago. But the homicide rate among indigenous Canadians is about double what India’s was in 1990, and triple of what India’s is today. It’s almost 20 times higher than China’s homicide rate.
British Pakistanis and British Hindus look basically the same, especially to a naive native European, but the groups are internally different enough to be on the opposite ends of the British societal ladder in all sorts of attributes - education, wealth, crime rate etc.
This is a complicated issue that I don't see being solved in my lifetime. The higher-than-average crime of this population is genuine and not solely attributed to false racial persecution. Surely some of it is, but it would not account for the entire skew. All it takes to see this is to take a ride on the Edmonton transit system or spend a week in Maskwacis. Obviously the crime is a result of poverty, generational trauma, historic mistreatment and cultural genocide, and IMO the failure of the reserve system. How do you fix it, I don't know... but acknowledging treaty land at every public event and re-naming streets in Cree is probably less useful than fixing the third-world conditions of reserves.
20 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 59.2 ms ] threadThere’s plenty of questions to ask if you consider for a moment the implications of police murdering people at will.
Edit: The “Censorship attempts” section of the Wikipedia page is informative as well, and shows that someone inside the police department attempted to delete mention of these events on a Wikipedia page about the police force. We might ask: do they have a habit of erasing information related to their crimes?
It’s just like how people see ten murders by blacks on the news and assume all blacks are murderers. No, that’s just ten black murders and nothing more.
That said, the Salem witch trials were only a couple dozen people: https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+people+died+in+sale...
versus the larger genocides and cleansings of the Nazis, Cultural Revolution, etc.
If it were orders of magnitude higher, I suspect there'd be more direct evidence in the record, including names.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Alberta#Visibl...
https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/0238e596-4add-46ee-81eb-2dbf...
The doc you linked says 39% of inmates are First Nations, and this[0] says they are 37% of Alberta murder victims.
Of course this isn't saying that there isn't inequality in the system, but just that happens before someone gets sentenced.
[0] https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=351001...
Generally speaking, crime isn’t a matter of economics. My dad’s village in Bangladesh in the 1950s—when 1/4 of kids died before the age of five—was safer then than Toronto is today.
“Socioeconomic factors” by themselves have limited explanatory potential. Even the poorest Canadian reservations are wealthier per capita than India is now or China was a few years ago. But the homicide rate among indigenous Canadians is about double what India’s was in 1990, and triple of what India’s is today. It’s almost 20 times higher than China’s homicide rate.
British Pakistanis and British Hindus look basically the same, especially to a naive native European, but the groups are internally different enough to be on the opposite ends of the British societal ladder in all sorts of attributes - education, wealth, crime rate etc.