It seems weird to say that filing anything incorrectly doesn’t constitute “procedural irregularity”. I don’t know, maybe that’s a specific term of law in this particular jurisdiction, but if that’s the case it doesn’t seem to mean anything close to what the actual words mean.
6 comments
[ 5.8 ms ] story [ 25.7 ms ] thread[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40043949
The Register has such a heavy style that I can't always understand what they're trying to say.
The top comment (by danielvf) in the linked thread explains the whole situation much better.