HN Explorer

4 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 7.8 ms ] thread
48864w6ui
It's probably a safe assumption that maintainers have a high enough tax burden (less safe if one asks: in which jurisdiction?) for the proposed credit to be useful, but it is an assumption nonetheless
tldrthelaw
A refundable credit would provide the credit regardless of burden (i.e. it will create a refund for every dollar it credits you beyond your burden).
gus_massa
The problem for the mantainer would be dealing with the spam of silly PR just to collect money.

I think that all PR are important and useful, even fixing a sincgle char in a typo of the docs, but if the incentive is high enought people would send unuseful PR,like fixinf

  for (i=0; i<10; i++)
to

  for (counter=0; counter<10; counter++)