Fortunately many of the bullet points are clearly in violation the First Amendment (according to most interpretations), and quite likely the Vagueness Doctrine as well:
Imagine filing a Title VI complaint against someone because they "required of Belgium or Canada a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation."
5 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 24.9 ms ] threadhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090...
And of the IHRA Working Definition which it effectively enshrines as law:
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definitio...
Fortunately many of the bullet points are clearly in violation the First Amendment (according to most interpretations), and quite likely the Vagueness Doctrine as well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagueness_doctrine
So let's hope the judicial challenges against it are swift and decisive.
You're on that side, where you will stay. Don't worry, we will come to you.