this has every look of a potentially talented developer that seriously misunderstands the legalities and role of open-source. there's probably a way to do what they intend, but this ain't it. and you don't make "open-source" but say "mine! mine! you can't change it/use it".
does this violate any github policy? certainly the apache foundation should have a word.
4 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 20.7 ms ] threadoh, and it was flagged. probably for self-promotion. of course.
this has every look of a potentially talented developer that seriously misunderstands the legalities and role of open-source. there's probably a way to do what they intend, but this ain't it. and you don't make "open-source" but say "mine! mine! you can't change it/use it".
does this violate any github policy? certainly the apache foundation should have a word.