Misinformation posted to X comes from 'superspreader' accounts, say researchers (abc.net.au)

This finding is not surprising at all. It's well established that the majority of ALL consumed content comes from a small number of sources, relative to the population.

Misinformation following the same pattern as all other content seems rather uninteresting.

I would like to know about the differences in how misinformation spreads when compared to other content.

Yesterday there was a massive concentrated effort to spread a fake translation from a gaza video.

It's hard to fight misinformation when it's coming from a state-level actor.

This specific statement has been repeated several times in the past on many different websites.

We all know this at this point.

What is being done about it?