Show HN: Bliss – A constructed writing system for fast and beautiful writing (space.tcsenpai.com)
Of course, this is just for fun and is absolutely NOT to be used for anything related to security or secrecy.
Anyway, I'd love to hear some feedback :)
Anyway, I'd love to hear some feedback :)
45 comments
[ 34.4 ms ] story [ 2394 ms ] threadhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blissymbols
https://www.blissymbolics.org/
http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/bliss-2302/ (5 minutes after start)
Note how the vowels can be put in different ways as long as they keep their positions. Also forgive my terrible handwriting.
https://imgur.com/a/AAa2m53
Anyway, let me try:
Let's say you have a upside triangle which is an "L" and you want to write "le" (because why not). You draw the triangle and then you draw just below the triangle the "e" symbol. You can decide if to make it linked to the shape above (sort like a bubble coming out from the bottom in this case) or to keep them separated (so it would be a sort of smiling mouth under the triangle).
I am not sure that for ball pens or pencils, not lifting has any advantage.
You already know the answer if you've ever written anything quickly by hand: it has significant advantages.
E.g.
ကာ - ka ကီ - ki ကူ - ku ကေ - ke ကို - ko ကော - kaw
An example of introducing tengwar to latin-scripted "lang belta" readers: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qz22f7ScqHnacRHn_PM1zZ3nUhV...
as well as the opposite direction, introducing latin script to "tengwa" readers: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gK3q843zdDOpsmKP1lHfoYpDXuf...
Also, you say in the intro that this script is intended to have some unique advantages. What are they? The article doesn't actually mention any.
The unique advantage (well, "unique") is the fact that is easy to memorize, at least for me
I often thought, writing speed could be improved quite a bit if we just removed strokes from some characters.
There is a reason that historical alphabets quickly developed highly distinct symbols, and it is only very loosely connected to the symbols represented at first (e g. Hebrew י representing a hand). And you'll notice that these forms - across most language familys - took only a few hundred years to develop, and have remained largely unchanged for two millennia. The modern forms of most language letters - at least the European and Middle Eastern ones that I am familiar with - are nearly perfect for their purpose.
At least, the letters are ))
Totally true. Indeed the goal of creating a conscript, at least for me, is to have fun and be able to keep something like a journal that would look funny and "cryptic" at a quick glance. Maybe one day I will manage to create a cursive that is also nice to see and easy to remember : )
What feel kinda curious to me about this one, is that I see no reason or pattern for why certain letters are circles, squares or triangles. It seems to be a case of just taking all consonants in the order they have in the latin alphabet, and then randomly making the first four circles, the next four squares, the next four triangles, etc...
In my own attempts I would always try to have meaning to the shape. Like is it a voiced sound or not? Is it a plosive? Is it "soft" or a "hard" sound? etc.
So, if you a see a triangle, you know that imparts a certain quality to it... the only distinction you see here is between vowels and consonants?
As stated, it’s not for ciphers.
As commented it’s not for dyslexic people.
As remarked upon it’s not for speed writers.
In addition it’s just the Latin alphabet using a set of squares, circles and triangles. So much so that V was thrown in with U as though this competed with the original Latin (which also had no distinction between I & J).
So we have potentially hard to both read & write character set that has way too many chances of being misread due to sloppiness (e.g. people like me and my spider crawl) that provides just what benefit?
A system where every symbol repeats with 90 degrees rotation multiple times is... not going to be very useful. Some writing systems like Arabic or Devanagari sidestep this by forcing the symbols to align on a line, but they sacrifice some functions to gain that.
Another aspect is kerning: when symbols don't uniformly fill the allocated space some pairs of symbols will inevitably look farther apart than others. Ideally, there should be as few such pairs as possible.
Of course, there are some other practical constraints like the direction in which the writer needs to move the writing tool, will the writer be able to see the symbols as they write them due to how they move the tool. How easy it is to confuse an essential element of a symbol for a decoration (what if you try to create a cursive version of a grotesque font? what if you want serifs?)
----
If I were to approach the task of creation of ideal writing system, I'd probably be looking at symmetries. An approach that would ensure that symbols are more or less unique under affine transformations. Another thing: something that eg. Japanese phonetic alphabet tried to do: group symbols by morphology. Eg. "B" and "P" should be more similar than, eg. "B" and "A", but there should also be a common theme for "B", "D", "G", "V" that's absent from "P", "T", "K", "F", and so on.
Also, there's really no reason to stick with Latin alphabet as the template. The I/J/Y, C/K/Q and V/U/W groups aren't good, just one character for the group is enough.