So is my understanding correct that only institutional investors are allowed to benefit from making outrageous public claims about the health of companies regardless of the claims basis in reality?
I don’t think they have any legal basis just because he put a screenshot of his account, twice, plus an Uno card. That is it… that is outrageous if they censor him for that. Extremely unfair to retail traders.
5 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 23.1 ms ] thread- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40566821
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40567028
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40567951
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40569826
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40570525
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40573281
Anyway, in the morning, I and several others started seeing trend headline article for the day appear as:
> "couldn't be verified"
I referenced a bit about it here: https://old.reddit.com/r/PROGME/comments/1d72zp0/bloomberg_u...
but then later E*trade Morgan Stanley headlines took over. I commented a bunch of links to lots of posts that I saw first on r/Superstonk regarding things mentioned here: https://old.reddit.com/r/PROGME/comments/1d7fmia/etrade_cons...