Feels like you should be able to use some basic image recognition to build out a privacy-preserving version, perhaps providing a cartoon rendering of the crowd. Surely the key information here that's wanted is "how many people, and what demographic"
No ones using this to actually get useful information. The key thing is people watching and hoping something wacky happens, are you unaware of just how popular “IRL” streaming is with gen-z/alpha?
It seems like you could easily address privacy concerns while keeping the app useful by automatically blurring faces or just lowering the resolution. I really love the idea for this app because the number one challenge when going out is finding venues that aren't too crowded to enjoy, trying to tell based on recent visit metrics helps but is sometimes misleading.
I use Google Maps feature where it shows you if a venue is busy or not a lot. I feel like Google maps could easily make this feature more accurate and widely available and completely obliterate these fucking weirdos who want to livestream and broadcast bars.
As someone who likes to go to bars/nightclubs, blurring isn’t a solution. Its not just random people, think about crazy exes that can recognize you from your clothes/build. This is a really dumb idea.
The Google maps busy bar chart won’t tell me if a club is packed with bros with a weird vibe
At the end of the day, I don’t like being filmed but there really is nothing I can do about it. For the past 10 years anywhere you go people are posting selfies and videos with a complete disregard for anyone around them.
Privacy in public is dead and is never coming back
The mention of Jamie Zawinski[1] caught my eye; quoted in the article as owner of DNA Lounge in SF, he is probably known for many other things by HN dwellers: namer of Mozilla, one of Netscape's initial employees, Lisp hacker during the 80s/90s, and featured in Peter Seibel's book, Coders at Work (which is why the name stood out for me).
Seems like 'blurred audio' would be better? ('blurred' such that you can't hear a conversation even if it's quiet and the speaker's close to the microphone) plus a couple of photos of the sort that probably exist on any website or Google Maps entry anyway to show 'typical' and give an idea of the aesthetic/vibe.
Public CCTV does just seem weird, I'm not sure what you could do to it to fix it that would keep it useful. Maybe pretty extreme blurring, but think they'd have to be really established to the point that everyone expects it everywhere, and knows & trusts how extreme the blurring is. Otherwise when you first hear of it you'll be on edge until you've seen it yourself however much it takes to trust how blurred it is...
I like this idea. I paid to get into a bar in Philadelphia, and it was completely dead. That could've been a special case, but it would've been really cool to just open an app and see inside the bar and say oh, there's nobody there, so I'm not going to go.
I like this app that curates a list of bars to never enter or go near. Cutting out the subjective nature of reviews to establish “terrible venue ran by staggeringly stupid individuals” and replacing it with an objectively correct list of volunteer entries is very efficient
21 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 62.9 ms ] threadAs someone who likes to go to bars/nightclubs, blurring isn’t a solution. Its not just random people, think about crazy exes that can recognize you from your clothes/build. This is a really dumb idea.
At the end of the day, I don’t like being filmed but there really is nothing I can do about it. For the past 10 years anywhere you go people are posting selfies and videos with a complete disregard for anyone around them.
Privacy in public is dead and is never coming back
Build it and I will come.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Zawinski
Edit: typo
Showing HN refered visitors a nutsack in a cup due to the actions of Gary Tan?
Public CCTV does just seem weird, I'm not sure what you could do to it to fix it that would keep it useful. Maybe pretty extreme blurring, but think they'd have to be really established to the point that everyone expects it everywhere, and knows & trusts how extreme the blurring is. Otherwise when you first hear of it you'll be on edge until you've seen it yourself however much it takes to trust how blurred it is...
Reminds me of traffic cameras.
Maybe I could macro on this for the introverts. But what is the correct max of introverts before a bar becomes “hopping”?