GenAI code transparency and council to exchange anonymized GenAI usage stats

We're working on GenAI code transparency- understanding how much GenAI is in codebases, and how / where it's used.

Would welcome thoughts on two things:

A. if folks care / do not care / have other reasons to care about this topic besides the ones below.

B. if there's interest in joining a free council to exchange anonymized stats on GenAI code usage.

Cheers.

A. why care about GenAI code transparency

five reasons we've heard so far- do you care? do you have others? do you see it differently?

1. Code Quality / Maintainability. GenAI code needs a human in the loop to make sure it's correct and sufficient quality. so "pure" GenAI code, straight from a prompt, is risky rather than "blended."

2. Code Security. GenAI coding tools come with security risks (obvi so does Open Source code too), so security stage gates should be put in and, too, pure GenAI code is a smell.

3. GenAI coding tools can help avoid mundane tasks / help with refactoring and prototyping, so it's helpful for teams to know how much GenAI is used to encourage the right kind of use.

4. GenAI coding tools need to be used correctly to avoid intellectual property risk (especially trade secret and copyright, there's not a patenting risk).

5. third parties will eventually care about this-- acquirers/ investors, insurance companies, procurement offices. wherever an SBOM is needed today.

B. is there interest/ feedback in an GenAI Coding Advisory Council?

1. Free to join 2. Participants get benchmarking data from similar companies on their GenAI usage 3. Only requirement is sharing own team's/ organization’s GenAI code usage stats, which would be anonymized before sharing