Wild that as they grow and scale, sustainable or climate-sensitive power can't be sourced or relatively (directly) scaled.
It will be interesting to see over the next few decades if sustainable power sources (arguably Nuclear, especially under the recent Advance Act) won't just be a lagging situation.
75% of the emissions in the report are from "scope 3" which is mostly embodied emissions of equipment. So the necessary sustainable power sources would be in China mainly, not ones serving Google's datacenters.
Maybe because they are trying to influence policy goals? Google is a large customer but it is still a teensy tiny fraction of American electricity consumption. I don't understand why the press has decided that it falls on the information industry alone to decarbonize the US (and global) power grid.
5 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 19.6 ms ] threadIt will be interesting to see over the next few decades if sustainable power sources (arguably Nuclear, especially under the recent Advance Act) won't just be a lagging situation.