Show HN: I’ve made a cheaper SEO research tool (withtelescope.com)
In the last 13 months I've spent total $1297 for Ahrefs subscription. Sounds like a little too much so I've build my own Keywords Research tool - Telescope.
While building it my total bill was $51 for 2 months and 41k+ keywords found. Every page of keywords costs $0.03 - $0.05. 2 payment options - usage-based subscription or just top up your balance with the amount you'd like to.
Telescope includes a couple of things:
- Keywords Explorer - finding keywords based on seed phrase and filters
- Keywords Ideas - keywords on interception on provided keywords
- Ranked Keywords - keywords a domain you specified with their positions and change since last DB update
- Saved Keywords - to store found keywords and plan the SEO strategy
I've put a lot of love into it and would love to get some feedback. IMPORTANT: every new account gets some free balance to start with. Appreciate it!
131 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 205 ms ] thread@kulhavy in telegram
@kulhavy in telegram
We're working right now on adding On Page + Backlinks into the app so Telescope becomes go-to solution for SEO
https://www.lua.org/
I run a marketplace in Brazil (kwara.com.br) and we happen to be focusing on SEO at the moment! What's your coverage in Portuguese / Brazilian market keywords? Or is it US only at the moment?
(Ps, I don't mind the tool itself being in english)
We have 150M+ keywords for Brazil (PT) and 30M+ for Portugal (PT) and tons of other countries/languages too
Our main goal is to make it affordable for makers like us. Paying $140\m doesn't seem like a good idea and not many has such a budged, so here is our solution
So I guess it makes sense that there is innovation on the pricing model side of things.
We use ubersuggest which has a lifetime pricing, quite neat.
Buy itself that's not bad. The problem is that if you're doing what everyone else is doing, then you're probably not realizing any efficiencies. That means your prices will eventually mirror everyone elses.
I always thought keyword tools use both: backlink data and estimated search volumes.
For example ahrefs has, to the best of my knowledge, its own crawler for backlink data but mostly buys search volume estimates.
Does your tool offer search volume estimates at all and does it come from the same provider as the backlink data?
edit: Ubersuggest mentioned by someone says in dev blog
https://neilpatel.com/blog/ubersuggest-update/
> My data feed from SEO Power Suite, Data For SEO, and Shared Count totaled $75,253 for January.
Is this the backend mentioned?
Some direct links for others interested in this
https://www.link-assistant.com/backlink-api.html
https://dataforseo.com/
https://www.sharedcount.com/
I think the real value of a keyword tool like ahrefs lies in the estimated search volume which comes from different sources than the backlinks.
Is this about a monopolistic provider of backlink data or search volume estimates?
Pretty sure they buy data from software tools like free anti-virus scanners, toolbars, chrome extensions, VPNs, etc that resell their user's web browsing history. This is called "click stream data".
[0] https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/78119-where-do-you-get-t...
This is also, why I think the data must be heavily biased. For example the HN demographic must be severely underrepresented, because most of us are careful what we install.
This is correct, but you can estimate the bias.
B2B keywords typically have 2-5x higher search volume/month than the popular tools estimate, for exactly the reason you provided. More sophisticated searchers aren't installing random anti-virus, VPNs, and plugins the SEO tools rely on to calculate keyword search volume.
FYI, the `www` version of your domain doesn't resolve. You might want to add a redirect.
Oh, you're right! We'll fix this one asap
No, and we don't plan to have an API yet. Thank you!
Also thank you for sharing and congratulations on shipping. Will definitely try this out in the coming days!
We'll fix this asap
We'll try to fix this asap.
While content mills that could crank out any keyword optimized content very cheaply existed for a long time it is now basically free. Whereas producing deep and well researched articles maybe doesn't need that razor sharp focus on specific keywords?
Since you made this tool, you probably think otherwise, but I would like to hear your opinion.
I would say that meaningless, soulless inputs had already inundated the WWW thanks to the economics of Search Engine Optimisation.
They believe they need to buy SEO services, this service can be offered cheaper than competitors
Question: Do you have (or plan to provide) features like -
-- Questions around the seed keywords
-- Keyword exports for external analysis with details like volume, difficulty, etc,
-- Can I tag keywords if I save them in a particular list?
In my work, I do SEO research almost every day and have a very extensive keyword strategy. So above features are what's keeping me stick to SEMrush.
We're planning to add premade filters for "Questions" and "Long tail" and a couple of others filtersets.
Keywords Export is coming for sure.
You can't tag just yet, but we will add this to backlog and implement according to our roadmap.
18M+ keywords for France. Arabic is supported, but not for France
Do you happen to know keyword tools that specialize on app store and play store search?
Our data provider has data from these marketplaces and if you stick for long enough with us we will add them for sure as current solutions are sooooo expensive.
It comes from Google Ads (different tools)
- No option to sort by columns
Thank you for feedback!
Soon we'll have backlink data and it'll open up even more details on Keywords, SERP Preview, Domain Overview
What would I miss from ahref ?
There are quite a few limits in Ahrefs's Starter plan, but on the other hand you have access to Site Explorer and Site Audit which we don't have just yet. For Keyword Research it's almost 1:1.
Thank you!
Are searches cached locally in my account?
I accidentally reload a page, it seems to run the search again and charge the (free and provided) balance.
Thanks