Ask HN: Is a 6 Day Work Week the new norm?
I was pinged today by a recruiter from LatchBio. A well-funded (backed by Coutue and General Catalyat) Bay Area Series A startup. The role sounds great and the company seems to have a lot of traction but when I did some digging (the recruiter didn’t mention this) all jobs listed in their site state “We work six days a week (Mon-Sat) in person in Mission Bay, SF ”
Do any other junior to mid-level folks work for companies that require this? Is it worth considering if everything else about the company seems great?
41 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 72.7 ms ] threadIf you moved to Mission Bay, you'd have a load of sunk cost, to be more reluctant to bail when the job turned out to be not-so-good.
I'd tell the recruiter "Sorry, a bit of digging says they work 6-day weeks, thankyoubye".
Followed quickly by thinking that is exactly the kind of exploitative crap that nobody should put up with. Don't normalize that kind of environment by even considering it.
Do they give you 6 weeks of mandatory vacation? Do they pay you 40% more than an equivalent job at a 5 days per week company?
On the other hand, the founder/CEO is very young/inexperienced which could explain some of the unusual management style.
It's not worth considering. It's a clear sign that someone clueless is running the company.
If not, the company might be courting a discrimination lawsuit (IANAL). Requiring work on Saturdays as a condition of employment would effectively exclude Orthodox Jews and observant Muslims from working there. Cf Groff v Dejoy
https://boards.greenhouse.io/latchbio/jobs/4058387008
I often work on saturdays to kill some time solving a problem but I would absolutely reject anyone who mentions a six day work week.
Obviously a startup will require some weekends.
I really hope there is valid equity in exchange for those extra work hours. By valid equity the terms are more important than the percentage level. If the equity were right AND I had a title that provided some degree of autonomy/ownership of the work I could see myself working 60-80 hours per week. Otherwise max of 40 is all they get and I will not budge.
Still, I can’t do it though! You will pay more in burn out and its long term toll.
I find that work in those companies are fairly chill because of this. Developer experience is a lot better. It's more drag and drop. Longer hours mean you see people in offices just hanging out until late at night. They'll scarf down a naan in 6.8 minutes, then head up to office, then watch something on their computer.
Companies with less hours are generally more stressful. You need to be pretty smart. Sometimes you have to find out where the docs are. Sometimes you have to read the code and not the docs. It's really up to what you're comfortable with.
What really sucks is the companies that work 6 days but think that they're actually working hard. It's a slider whether you want to work harder or work longer hours.
> Do any other junior to mid-level folks work for companies that require this? Is it worth considering if everything else about the company seems great?
Depends on your situation. It's a tough market out there.
I'd say no personally, but if I were in a different financial/life position I could see saying yes.