82 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 137 ms ] thread
This is a great host for all my privacy disclosures for my websites and apps.
You might also like http://pauperhosting.nl/
The link behind "Click here for English" is a good one, I have to remember that. Good idea.
Next to a German flag, even though the website's in Dutch. Perfect.
I once had a link on a Greek website that said "click here if you don't speak Greek" and linked to a "learn Greek online" search.
I like how deep the rabbit hole goes on pauperhosting. The accidentally included admin panel with leaked customer db, the VPS demo, everything. I'm pretty sure I haven't even discovered half of it yet.
Almost all the customer names in that excel file are taken from "huilende rappers - waddepjedangedaan", on a joke rap album by drum and bass legends noisia. It's all in Dutch... but the made up names are so incredibly funny that i use them for dummy data everywhere.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o4uLvqM7Clc

I like how clicking "here" for English takes you to a DuckDuckGo search.
How do we know they even power up any servers at all, for the service? I mean, they could simply just not power up any servers at all. Till then, I’ll opt for the ‘take-my-money’ plan.
Ideally they wouldn’t need to power up the servers but you can see from the graph that unfortunately there’s still some uptime, though they are working on it, maybe once they reach 100% downtime
I think I heard that moving from 99.99% unavailability to 99.999% unavailability costs ten times more.
This is a great place to host all those litigation hold files.
The site being currently up does not inspire confidence.
This is just the marketing site.

Reasonable to expect it's hosted on different infra with different reliability

(comment deleted)
It even survives the HN hug of death. Very disappointing.
How bad is the HN hug of death btw? My laptop can serve 200k QPS per core. I can't imagine HN is that much more intensive? Are 1vCPU VMs just that much worse?
Your laptop can serve 200k qps per core?
To be fair, most modern computers can, but yes.
Yes, they are much worse than bon-fide actual single cores on most recently purchased laptops. But also, the HN hug of death mostly happens with tiny non-static sites that are sloppily hosted. If you're serving static assets it's hard to "hug of death" a Casio watch.
The thing that gets saturated first for most at-home or cheap-VPS hosting is the low-throughput network uplink.
(comment deleted)
Can you serve 200GB of an average 1mb large HTML page per second too, per core?
Holy crap what kind of laptop are you running?
M3 at work, Acer Swift 3 at home. Both are comparable in that regard. You can do 200k QPS of actual work (a little protobuf parsing, a little old-school ML, handling the networking, a little HTTP1.1 parsing, ...), more if you just want vanity metrics, just by wrapping something like uSockets [0] and not doing anything to explicitly pessimize the system.

You can do better with a hand-crafted solution, but most projects don't need anything fancier.

[0] https://github.com/uNetworking/uSockets

Context is a website, so HTTPS requests per second would be the relevant metric.
I'm also quoting HTTPS requests per second.
Finally I have discovered where my university moodle servers are located!
> Don't like uploading your files via FTP? No problem! Send us your files on a floppy and we'll upload it for you. It's one of the many ways we do our best to accommodate your needs. Just remember, our floppy system does not accept Windows, Linux, or Mac floppies.

OS/2 Warp is back, baby!

I heard they’re announcing unlimited write-only object storage soon
Perfect place for hosting internal docs
(comment deleted)
I am not very good at telling jokes.

But even i can tell, that this is low effort. You really get a laugh out of it? Like "hahahaha, they said PHP 5"?

And php 6 doesn't exists.
That's a little thing we call a joke.
This site is very, very old.
Wow this is the kind of thing that will disrupt a ton of industries!
This looks like a good service for compute, but it's way over priced for storage. It probably makes most sense to use the included disk for application code only and store all data in something like S4 [1]

[1]: http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/

Under "Key scenarios" they include "SETI@home output recorder". Ouch.
I wonder if I can make an interesting project using the I'm-poor specs
Ugh. I can’t get to the purchase screen. Nothing seems to work properly. 24/8 support?! This site is a joke.
The HTML source is pretty good too. A doctype that's half HTML5, half XHTML. A pre-IE7 script tag thing. A meta-keywords tag. Lists that don't actually use any list tags. Raw PHP tags being dumped into the HTML output. No closing body or html tags. This joke has _layers_, man.
Needs more iframes from the sound of it…
Needs more <center> and spacer.gifs too!
clearly you need to setup a competitor as you really know what you’re doing ;)
Perhaps gp already did but they are so good at it that even the website itself is offline.
> No closing body or html tags.

Well those are officially optional now so it's just well optmized HTML.

Finally a service that tells the truth!
everything about this design is such a throwback.