Ask HN: Why are job adverts misleading about WFH?
I think it's misleading to have an option for "Location" as "Work from Home" then allow ads that don't fit this description.
I've used https://seek.com.au however I'm finding that it's increasingly normal for employers to advertise their jobs as "Hybrid WFH" with some being as bad as 1-day per week out of the office.
If I wanted a "Hybrid WFH" selection, I would happily choose that.
It's like these companies think gaming the system will magically stop employees from reading job adverts.
Personally I'm just doing it out of curiosity - I've been in a WFH role for a while now and think a hybrid option might be better overall for mental / physical health but I'm still annoyed at this weird culture of false-advertising roles to find candidates.
Discuss?
9 comments
[ 4.0 ms ] story [ 42.2 ms ] threadSeems more likely that they think they're offering a legitimate concession or benefit in allowing 1 day WFH.
So -- at least a few years ago -- they were trying to cast a wide net and get as many interested leads for the job as possible. It's just a numbers game for them.
OTOH, they might want you to read loads of them until you are blue in the face and see how unlikely it is :(
The other issue might be budget, again if the company is large budgets may be aligned to a spec or team location or hub. At this point in time a role might be 100% WFH but also for team f2f meetings/gatherings etc it might be more difficult to organise if WFH is across a large country instead of a city and its satellite towns.