[–] richard___ 1y ago ↗ You need to post some credentials for someone to believe your techniques here work. [–] ilrwbwrkhv 1y ago ↗ What a horrible thing to say. Appeal to authority on "hacker" news. Really? [–] Onawa 1y ago ↗ I mean, it would also be nice to see at least a single link or reference... At least the July 2nd article didn't have a single reference in it. [–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > What a horrible thing to say.That's what snake oil salesmen said while clutching at their precious pearls. How dare anyone ask them to substantiate their claims? [–] birriel 1y ago ↗ Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things. [–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things.Are they, though? I mean, there are neither credentials nor claim substantiation. [–] fastneutron 1y ago ↗ Assuming good faith, It’s possible to ask for references and citations without being rude and unwelcoming.“Hi, interesting work! Do you have any other recommended reading on $SUBJECT?” [–] piuantiderp 1y ago ↗ For real, Richard's mommy doesn't let them date people she hasn't vetted before.Alas, who are we to blame, him or his mother? [–] [deleted] 1y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] ilrwbwrkhv 1y ago ↗ What a horrible thing to say. Appeal to authority on "hacker" news. Really? [–] Onawa 1y ago ↗ I mean, it would also be nice to see at least a single link or reference... At least the July 2nd article didn't have a single reference in it. [–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > What a horrible thing to say.That's what snake oil salesmen said while clutching at their precious pearls. How dare anyone ask them to substantiate their claims? [–] birriel 1y ago ↗ Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things. [–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things.Are they, though? I mean, there are neither credentials nor claim substantiation. [–] fastneutron 1y ago ↗ Assuming good faith, It’s possible to ask for references and citations without being rude and unwelcoming.“Hi, interesting work! Do you have any other recommended reading on $SUBJECT?” [–] piuantiderp 1y ago ↗ For real, Richard's mommy doesn't let them date people she hasn't vetted before.Alas, who are we to blame, him or his mother?
[–] Onawa 1y ago ↗ I mean, it would also be nice to see at least a single link or reference... At least the July 2nd article didn't have a single reference in it.
[–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > What a horrible thing to say.That's what snake oil salesmen said while clutching at their precious pearls. How dare anyone ask them to substantiate their claims? [–] birriel 1y ago ↗ Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things. [–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things.Are they, though? I mean, there are neither credentials nor claim substantiation. [–] fastneutron 1y ago ↗ Assuming good faith, It’s possible to ask for references and citations without being rude and unwelcoming.“Hi, interesting work! Do you have any other recommended reading on $SUBJECT?”
[–] birriel 1y ago ↗ Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things. [–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things.Are they, though? I mean, there are neither credentials nor claim substantiation.
[–] chipdart 1y ago ↗ > Posting credentials and substantiating claims are two different things.Are they, though? I mean, there are neither credentials nor claim substantiation.
[–] fastneutron 1y ago ↗ Assuming good faith, It’s possible to ask for references and citations without being rude and unwelcoming.“Hi, interesting work! Do you have any other recommended reading on $SUBJECT?”
[–] piuantiderp 1y ago ↗ For real, Richard's mommy doesn't let them date people she hasn't vetted before.Alas, who are we to blame, him or his mother?
[–] manvillej 1y ago ↗ This is a little too close to Learning How to Learn by Dr Oakley. You might have a copyright violation FYI.don't get me wrong, I like the content, but this feels intentionally close. [–] tamiral 1y ago ↗ DR OAKLEY is the [–] flysand7 1y ago ↗ He is indeed the [–] SuperNinKenDo 1y ago ↗ She actually, but otherwise you're both totally right about [–] seanhunter 1y ago ↗ While they're enforcing copyrights they should go after this https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00971And this udemy course https://www.udemy.com/course/learning-to-learn/?couponCode=S...or maybe this other udemy course actually https://www.udemy.com/course/learning-how-to-learn-with-the-...and this https://www.lifehack.org/691373/learn-how-to-learn-how-to-un...or what about this https://todoist.com/inspiration/learning-new-skillor how about the fact that the UK national education syllabus has an entire subject and framework called "Learning to learn" https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/articles/learning-learn Is that too close?etc etcYou couldn't possibly enforce a copyright on this - it's an incredibly common usage and I'm sure that it was around before Dr Oakley since it is just literally the plain meaning of the words.
[–] tamiral 1y ago ↗ DR OAKLEY is the [–] flysand7 1y ago ↗ He is indeed the [–] SuperNinKenDo 1y ago ↗ She actually, but otherwise you're both totally right about
[–] flysand7 1y ago ↗ He is indeed the [–] SuperNinKenDo 1y ago ↗ She actually, but otherwise you're both totally right about
[–] seanhunter 1y ago ↗ While they're enforcing copyrights they should go after this https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00971And this udemy course https://www.udemy.com/course/learning-to-learn/?couponCode=S...or maybe this other udemy course actually https://www.udemy.com/course/learning-how-to-learn-with-the-...and this https://www.lifehack.org/691373/learn-how-to-learn-how-to-un...or what about this https://todoist.com/inspiration/learning-new-skillor how about the fact that the UK national education syllabus has an entire subject and framework called "Learning to learn" https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/articles/learning-learn Is that too close?etc etcYou couldn't possibly enforce a copyright on this - it's an incredibly common usage and I'm sure that it was around before Dr Oakley since it is just literally the plain meaning of the words.
[–] SuperNinKenDo 1y ago ↗ Looks interesting, but the AI images coupled with the title's weird proximity to an extremely well known book gives off a bit of a bad scent frankly.
16 comments
[ 47.2 ms ] story [ 658 ms ] threadThat's what snake oil salesmen said while clutching at their precious pearls. How dare anyone ask them to substantiate their claims?
Are they, though? I mean, there are neither credentials nor claim substantiation.
“Hi, interesting work! Do you have any other recommended reading on $SUBJECT?”
Alas, who are we to blame, him or his mother?
don't get me wrong, I like the content, but this feels intentionally close.
And this udemy course https://www.udemy.com/course/learning-to-learn/?couponCode=S...
or maybe this other udemy course actually https://www.udemy.com/course/learning-how-to-learn-with-the-...
and this https://www.lifehack.org/691373/learn-how-to-learn-how-to-un...
or what about this https://todoist.com/inspiration/learning-new-skill
or how about the fact that the UK national education syllabus has an entire subject and framework called "Learning to learn" https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/articles/learning-learn Is that too close?
etc etc
You couldn't possibly enforce a copyright on this - it's an incredibly common usage and I'm sure that it was around before Dr Oakley since it is just literally the plain meaning of the words.