Ask HN: What Are Your Biggest Frustrations with Software Tools and Services?
What software tools or services (SaaS, self-hosted, or open source) are you using that just don’t cut it? Whether it’s UX friction, frustrating pricing models, missing features, poor developer experience, support challenges or anything else—I'd love to hear your experiences.
Your insights could inspire a better solution by someone in the community.
Regarding my inspiration to post this, I am just looking for a project idea, not necessarily commercial, with the potential of actual "users" unlike last projects/startup. I deeply appreciate your attention and comments :)
7 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 33.0 ms ] threadI am always harassed about queries I didn't "save" but there isn't a model for saving queries that works with the way I do software development (e.g. I don't have a git repository full of SQL queries thought I might want to keep SQL queries in files in the same repo as my Java/Python/whatever and bring them in as resources)
Products like this don't respect the fact that I am thinking about how a few tables and/or a few rows fit together. I don't want to see a hairball graph of my whole database (e.g. SAP printed out their SQL tables UML style and it filled half the wall of a gymnasium) but I do want to see a piece of it I care about as a graph
All the time I want to see a few queries, rows and result sets at the same time but tools like this don't make that easy.
If I do
and get one row the columns are stacked horizontally so I can't see them all at once and have to scroll. I'd like to see one row stacked vertically so I can see it all at once and not have to scroll, scroll, scroll.For extra credit I want a tool that works with document db's (JSON tables in postgres, arangodb, couchdb, etc.) and SPARQL databases.
I too agree that this should be the centerpiece design element: "All the time I want to see a few queries, rows and result sets at the same time but tools like this don't make that easy."
- listviews are limited to 50 items. MSDOS apps running on 640kB memory could do better back in eighties.
- Adding a new item does not refresh listview. I had wits to do that when I was 13yo toying with qbasic.
- UI "windows" are just floating <div>s that can't be moved, with controls wherever UX monkey happened to have dropped them. Heck, even the (fake) close button can't have consistent left or right position. Compared to that mess, Windows 3 apps look like work of art.
- Many actions take long clock-to-display time. How come that rendering a few lines of text and some buttons is slower on gigahertz class multicore machine then pitiful 200Mhz celeron?
- Even the early, amateurish web apps from nineties, pushed through pathetic dialup internet had the common sense to check session timeout BEFORE displaying a form for user to fill in. Google today? Not so much.
I could continue, but this makes me sad.