Workers Uncover Underground Chamber Sealed for over a Century Near National Mall (smithsonianmag.com) 35 points by SMBriney 1y ago ↗ HN
[–] sybercecurity 1y ago ↗ Someone get Nic Cage on the phone, we have a sequel to make! [–] erickhill 1y ago ↗ Geraldo Rivera would like to live-stream entering it for the very first time during prime time for all the world to see. [–] RobRivera 1y ago ↗ But not before 50mins of media garbage [–] dylan604 1y ago ↗ The History Channel would turn it into 18 episode season. [–] ta1243 1y ago ↗ I was thinking Ben Stiller
[–] erickhill 1y ago ↗ Geraldo Rivera would like to live-stream entering it for the very first time during prime time for all the world to see. [–] RobRivera 1y ago ↗ But not before 50mins of media garbage [–] dylan604 1y ago ↗ The History Channel would turn it into 18 episode season.
[–] RobRivera 1y ago ↗ But not before 50mins of media garbage [–] dylan604 1y ago ↗ The History Channel would turn it into 18 episode season.
[–] bell-cot 1y ago ↗ The subtitle is more honest:> The dry cistern was discovered by construction crews...So it's more interesting than (say) a section of disused drainage pipe, but not by much.Coolest thing about the article, IMO, is the photograph of https://www.si.edu/castle
[–] tyberns 1y ago ↗ Lucky they found it safely and it wasn't discovered by a worker falling in it [–] [dead] poopsmithe 1y ago ↗ [flagged]
[–] pythonguython 1y ago ↗ They found a small hole with nothing in it and someone decided to write an article about it? [–] jandrese 1y ago ↗ It's more exciting than that. It used to have water in it. Ok, that isn't very exciting either. [–] notJim 1y ago ↗ IIUC, I think it was built to have water in it, but sealed up, so it never did. So not quite the thrill you're describing. [–] darknavi 1y ago ↗ Haven't you seen National Treasure? Who knows what sort of eye wear sits behind those bricks! [–] pfdietz 1y ago ↗ Maybe they were trying to appeal to tankies.
[–] jandrese 1y ago ↗ It's more exciting than that. It used to have water in it. Ok, that isn't very exciting either. [–] notJim 1y ago ↗ IIUC, I think it was built to have water in it, but sealed up, so it never did. So not quite the thrill you're describing.
[–] notJim 1y ago ↗ IIUC, I think it was built to have water in it, but sealed up, so it never did. So not quite the thrill you're describing.
[–] darknavi 1y ago ↗ Haven't you seen National Treasure? Who knows what sort of eye wear sits behind those bricks!
[–] munchler 1y ago ↗ Calling this a "chamber" seems like a stretch. A chamber is a kind of room, but a cistern is just an underground tank. [–] hinkley 1y ago ↗ I clicked hoping it was a prohibition era hidden room at least, but no it’s just a fucking water tank.Don’t even feel guilty about the ad blocker they guilt tripped me about.
[–] hinkley 1y ago ↗ I clicked hoping it was a prohibition era hidden room at least, but no it’s just a fucking water tank.Don’t even feel guilty about the ad blocker they guilt tripped me about.
[–] tiahura 1y ago ↗ If they think a 200 year old cistern is newsworthy, what would they think about the ones at Knossos or Tel Megiddo?
26 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 64.0 ms ] thread> The dry cistern was discovered by construction crews...
So it's more interesting than (say) a section of disused drainage pipe, but not by much.
Coolest thing about the article, IMO, is the photograph of https://www.si.edu/castle
Don’t even feel guilty about the ad blocker they guilt tripped me about.