18 comments

[ 7.3 ms ] story [ 48.0 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
I don't think a company should be raising funding at this level because it implies that at some eventual IPO the market cap will be $750B or more--no private investors are going in looking for less than 5x return. Honestly any valuation over, say, $50B should be in the public markets.
Do you believe public markets create better value for society than private ones?
retail investors may be not as efficient as private professional investors, but public markets allow retail investors to participate in wealth creation.
It will IPO once the “accredited investor” class have an inkling that the company has ~2 years of good growth left so they can make it past the lockup period and ride off into the sunset. Rinse and repeat. There is so much private capital out there, the only reason to go public is because retail investor folks lack the means for proper diligence & restitution.
funding -> IPO is relatively short term gain, where private investors indeed have significant advantage.

But there is also long term gain: 10-100y after IPO stocks in your 401k like google, facebook, tesla, microsoft, ibm, etc.

For a company like OpenAI I do. Especially in regards to the greater scrutiny.
I don't understand why they need a 5 billion dollar revolving credit facility.
I guess it's a reasonable enough financing decision for a fast growing pre-IPO company which cannot issue public debt. Gives them optionality and access to short-term debt at likely favorable terms, as I imagine banks are trying to please them however they can to win future mandates
Higher free cash flow bolsters the upside case for the next raise
That’s a massive valuation.

Are they preparing for a potential down turn, else at this level they might be setting themselves for a down round. Unless people believe that OpenAI could be the first $1T valuation startup

Unicorns are $1B valuation startups. What’s a good name for a $1T valuation startup? God Statup?

Phoenix? Might burst into flames at any point, but will likely be reborn in some form from the ashes
Unicorns were supposed to be mythical creatures, which Phoenix is too - so that works.

But Phoenix has a negative connotation with the burning into flames part. Not sure if many startups would like to call them Phoenixes :)

What about pegasus? Even better would be a pegacorn/alicorn, but not enough people are familiar with those names. It seems like the natural next step would be a unicorn that's taken flight.
$150b is enough to buy every single human alive 3 Big Macs. I wish VCs would make this happen rather than pouring $$ into OpenAI.