8 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 32.2 ms ] thread
Wow, the air sure is getting thinner for Viasat!

Hawaiian Airlines is already on Starlink; most other US carriers are Viasat based at this point, which still doesn't have coverage over the Pacific (due to the deployment failure of Viasat-3 F1) and are probably getting annoyed at this point. (Word is that Viasat is trying to salvage 10% of the capacity of 3F1 [1] and ultimately move it elsewhere.)

I bet nobody will be really unhappy about the significantly lower latency either...

The only thing that the incumbents seem to have going for them at this point is being available as an Airbus line fit as part of HBCplus – once Starlink is an option there, things are going to get interesting.

[1] https://spacenews.com/viasat-preparing-to-start-services-fro...

Amazing that Elon was the only one crazy enough to put his money behind such a complex goal.
What's even more amazing is that 99% of the money behind SpaceX is outside investors and the government.

Even when it was founded, Musk was a minority equity investor.

Musk was a minority investor when SpaceX was founded in 2002? Who were the other owners and how much did they own?
https://web.archive.org/web/20120313030030/http://www.forbes...

Even as late as 2012, Musk owned 2/3rds of SpaceX. This is after Falcon 9 was a successful product and they were starting to get NASA launches. He currently owns 54%.

SpaceX was founded with his own money from the Paypal sale, by December 2008 he was nearly bankrupt after multiple failed launches.

Please provide evidence for you assertions.

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/space-exploration-te...

Clearly shows the majority of money invested does not come from Musk.

Also, voting control is not the same as capital invested, not is there a 1:1 between the two.

His voting control is ~70%, it's his capital holdings that's around the ~50%+ mark.

The website you shared is most confusing. Please use some other website, its UI is frankly terrible.