The application automatically tweets your blog post to the world, thus giving you more exposure. I don't see why you should put down his work when it actually does what it's supposed to.
Hey now Accusey Adam (or is it Conjecturey Constance?), put down the pitchfork. There's no need to accuse people of sockpuppeting/gaming just because you don't like their project. It's hurtful to hear people call you a cheater when you just want to get feedback on your project.
Tamal has a pretty neat looking service (yes, one that's been done before, but still pretty neat). I've seen SPLASH PAGES with zero functionality get more votes on HN; why shouldn't Tamal get his 15 minutes?
You're judging to quickly. Take a step back and reconsider. The point is in the use-case, not the mechanics. He is allowing people to blog ad-hoc, using twitter as the glue to otherwise loose content containers. By doing this, he is extending the light(er) state-of-mind of twitting into blogging (which is otherwise a 'heavier' commitment). It's clever.
a lot? i think it's kind of different using twitter than a blog or a website. usually this last two require mantainance, or at least, a little time spent on them. which not everyone wants to give or even cares.
i really like this idea! i do not have a blog but i would love to start one, and i also do not use twitter much. but like this idea. but before i would love to see some posts examples.
This is my twitter
https://twitter.com/#!/SimoneMasieroDv
with a grand total of 6 tweets this year.
I agree with you that this thread is suspicious due to the number of votes it receive, when i first commented it had 11 votes and no comments. But anyway i can grant you i have nothing to do with it. I have a personal website, but it's sadly unfinished, http://hackertyper.net/portfolio
I just like the idea of not having to register to a new service to make some posts.
No text-based summary, introduction, or blurb? Not everyone is able to view video at the moment they come across your site; if they can't immediately read what it's about, they may not come back to find out.
Also I would put the page title blurb ("use Twitter as your blog") somewhere prominently in the page text. I had to read around here to figure out what itch this was scratching.
There are quite a few long message services. Most (if not all) are plain text. Prolifi.cc allows styling via Markdown, images, etc. More of a proper article post and less wall of text.
Less than that. Tumblr has it's own followers/following/social network. This does nothing more than "attach" a blog post to a tweet. apitaru put it quite well elsewhere in the comments.
Can it do code markup? I was looking for something the other day and I didn't want to set up my own 'blog'. Tumblr couldn't support Github gists for some reason, so really that' all you need.
Edit: On first glance, it doesn't seem to be able to embed Github gists. Darn.
Thanks for sharing that. I was looking for something like this, keep up the good work :)
Also, would be cool, if you decided at some point to open-source it or unless you went the startup route, and end up monetizing the hell out of it. Then again, making money and open-sourcing are not mutually exclusive, methinks...
Twitter has three permission levels: Read Only, Read and Write, and Read, Write, and Direct Messages.
In order to have it Tweet on your behalf it needs Read and Write permissions. Along with that comes all the other permissions. If I could exclude it I would.
There are only 3 types of permission levels in the twitter api: read, write and write with DM access.
Those displayed there are the details of the write access.
I think this is pretty cool, if for no other reason that it's a next step (not "the") in the evolution of the platforms.
It used to be you wrote a blog. Then you started using Twitter as a toy. Then you linked to blog posts on Twitter. Then you got lazy about updating your blog (i.e. Robert Scoble). Then you used only Twitter. Then you realized occasionally you want to say more than you can Tweet. Then.. Voila!
1.) The screenshot of the prolifi.cc landing page has the large black coming soon banner.
2.) At the point where you show the creation of a blog post, I think the left pane with all the markdown instructions is so visually distracting. Perhaps the video can just focus only the right pane...
I really liked the fact that you stated "you don't have a blog and you don't need one.." I think that really reinforces the concept and value of your product.
Would be more useful if prolifi has an extension. That way, when I exceed 160 chars on twitter, I am reminded that I can post the blurp through prolifi instead and have the link posted to twitter automatically. Similar to how Facebook implemented their Notes concept, which never made sense in the Facebook context.
I posted this elsewhere in the comments: "There are quite a few long message services. Most (if not all) are plain text. Prolifi.cc allows styling via Markdown, images, etc. More of a proper article post and less wall of text."
Would be cool as a browser plugin, so that when a message goes over the character limit, a button to post via Prolificc appears, all within the natural flow of using the Twitter website. You could even extend this concept by creating a Prolificc API to allow third party developers to integrate into popular twitter clients.
69 comments
[ 2.3 ms ] story [ 98.4 ms ] threadI don't get why this is #3 on HN right now.
Not hating on OP or his site, just sayin'.
I use to have this on my website with facebook instead of asking someone to create an account and link it with facebook.
If facebook bans your website => you can't access your account anymore
If facebook crash => you can't access you account anymore
If your facebook account is compromised => you can't access your account anymore
If facebook is blocked on the intranet => you can't ...
there are tons of reason people don't do zero-signup with twitter or facebook.
Tamal has a pretty neat looking service (yes, one that's been done before, but still pretty neat). I've seen SPLASH PAGES with zero functionality get more votes on HN; why shouldn't Tamal get his 15 minutes?
Relax and watch the blinkenlights.
Because the question is: how many people use twitter and don't have a blog or website?
This thread is getting really suspicious.
I just like the idea of not having to register to a new service to make some posts.
How about that blurb? ;)
Meanwhile, I've posted a blurb.
Flowplayer is really good by the way, check out http://j.mp/NBFTze if you're interested.
Edit: On first glance, it doesn't seem to be able to embed Github gists. Darn.
Edit: Gists is a good one. Added to my to-do list.
Also, would be cool, if you decided at some point to open-source it or unless you went the startup route, and end up monetizing the hell out of it. Then again, making money and open-sourcing are not mutually exclusive, methinks...
* Read Tweets from my timeline. * See who I follow, and follow new people. * Update my profile.
so, not registering, sry...
In order to have it Tweet on your behalf it needs Read and Write permissions. Along with that comes all the other permissions. If I could exclude it I would.
It used to be you wrote a blog. Then you started using Twitter as a toy. Then you linked to blog posts on Twitter. Then you got lazy about updating your blog (i.e. Robert Scoble). Then you used only Twitter. Then you realized occasionally you want to say more than you can Tweet. Then.. Voila!
1.) The screenshot of the prolifi.cc landing page has the large black coming soon banner.
2.) At the point where you show the creation of a blog post, I think the left pane with all the markdown instructions is so visually distracting. Perhaps the video can just focus only the right pane...
I really liked the fact that you stated "you don't have a blog and you don't need one.." I think that really reinforces the concept and value of your product.
Just my $0.02.
I'm attempting to turn it into a side-project to justify buying a Retina MacBook Pro, so I dusted it off, recorded the video, and updated a few bits.
Awesome weekend project!