There is value in contrasting the DoJ with the FTC, which has made a lot of noise but yielded—thus far—nothing substantial.
The DoJ is more powerful—it can bring criminal charges. But it’s also subject to a higher standard. (It couldn’t forget to define market share in a complaint, for instance.) Watch, carefully, for the folks who want a neophyte at the FTC but writhe at the DoJ’s teeth.
Why is Google's statement here? I don't really care about Google's opinion of a newly opened legal proceeding, of course their stance is that the DOJ is doing something bad.
> Hampering Google’s AI tools risks holding back American innovation at a critical moment
I would pay money to never see google search AI suggestions. If that’s what they consider innovation, then we definitely need more competing search engines.
7 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 24.7 ms ] threadThe DoJ is more powerful—it can bring criminal charges. But it’s also subject to a higher standard. (It couldn’t forget to define market share in a complaint, for instance.) Watch, carefully, for the folks who want a neophyte at the FTC but writhe at the DoJ’s teeth.
I would pay money to never see google search AI suggestions. If that’s what they consider innovation, then we definitely need more competing search engines.
But they at least have a "web" option, which just shows websites.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_search_log_release
The rest of Google's points are worthless hogwash.