A quick rule-of-thumb: if 'military-grade encryption' is mentioned, the author likely has no domain knowledge.
Further the article claims that SPNs are used in RSA... which is completely wrong and indicates no domain knowledge.
The article has completely mis-interpreted the paper. The paper is written in Chinese but with an English abstract - the article seems to have just pulled keywords out.
I wonder whether a LLM hallucination is at play somewhere???
6 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 26.7 ms ] threadThis doesn't sound as dramatic as the original article might have implied, but a pretty significant advancement nonetheless.
Further the article claims that SPNs are used in RSA... which is completely wrong and indicates no domain knowledge.
The article has completely mis-interpreted the paper. The paper is written in Chinese but with an English abstract - the article seems to have just pulled keywords out.
I wonder whether a LLM hallucination is at play somewhere???
The article does not mention AES