So the effect is statistically detectable but unbelievably small. Whoever wrote the conclusion is torturing the results to get something publishable.
For reference A1C is measured roughly on a range from 0% (but in practice really 5%) to 10% where 1-2 whole percentage point differences matter and this effect is an order of magnitude off of where it needs to be to be practical.
Time-restricted eating is not intermittent fasting. Limiting eating to an 8-10 hour window is totally doable with several small meals, no need to gorge on a single meal.
Generally the definition of "intermittent fasting" is limiting eating to a limited time window (e.g. 8 hours) per day. E.g. you "fast" for 16 hours, meaning you're not fasting for the other 8.
The research on time-restricted eating is astonishing to me, not just because it works so well but because it works with such a lax eating window. Restricting eating to an 8-10hr period is easily within grasp of most people and most lifestyles - eat a late breakfast and an early dinner and you're done. Probably the best bang for your buck in terms of diet/lifestyle interventions.
I had Claude 3 Haiku summarize this in lay terms since it's quite a complex topic.
Here is a more simplified summary of the key points:
This study looked at whether a type of fasting called time-restricted eating (TRE) could help improve health in people with metabolic syndrome.
Metabolic syndrome is a group of conditions like high blood sugar, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol that increase the risk of heart disease and diabetes.
The researchers had two groups of people with metabolic syndrome:
1. One group received standard nutritional counseling.
2. The other group received nutritional counseling plus a personalized TRE program. This meant they could only eat during an 8-10 hour window each day.
After 3 months, the TRE group showed a small but meaningful improvement in their HbA1c (a measure of blood sugar control) compared to the standard counseling group.
The study was relatively short and relied on people reporting their own diet, so the results may have been affected by other factors. But the researchers concluded that the TRE program could be a helpful lifestyle intervention to modestly improve blood sugar regulation in people with metabolic syndrome.
Yo dog - what is up with your obsession with making so many weird and judgemental comments about diet. Nothing you have said is backed in science or is particularly useful.
Oh you can call it being judgemental if you like to, you won't change my mind that people refusing to make change despite being overweight and then blaming it on "i tried, it doesn't work", "i have slower metabolism" and so on.. are at the end just not mentally strong enough.
i thought it would be common sense to eat less when you are overweight but the amount of people believing otherwise, at least on internet and on this part of the internet (male, around 30-40 years, good income, works in tech or sedentary job) is astonishing.
A good kick in the ass would work better than any pill.
What, thermodynamic laws aren't science ? If Calories in < calories out then weight loss.
As far as I know, no one can legally force someone else to eat something he doesn't want to. It basically mean that if you're fat it's because you didn't put enough will.
Time restricted eating is cool. Let's just not imply that it's special and the results are from anything other than the spontaneous reduction in calorie intake.
> In the setting of isocaloric eating, TRE [time restricted eating] did not decrease weight or improve glucose homeostasis relative to a UEP [usual eating pattern], suggesting that any effects of TRE on weight in prior studies may be due to reductions in caloric intake.
I think you missed completely the point. It is exactly the opposite of your conclusion, the benefits of TRE are not because of weight loss/reduced caloric intake.
18 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 33.1 ms ] threadSo the effect is statistically detectable but unbelievably small. Whoever wrote the conclusion is torturing the results to get something publishable.
For reference A1C is measured roughly on a range from 0% (but in practice really 5%) to 10% where 1-2 whole percentage point differences matter and this effect is an order of magnitude off of where it needs to be to be practical.
One of them mentioned that binge eating can lead to gallstones.
I wonder if intermittent fasting is risky in respect to your gall bladder and gallstones.
Here is a more simplified summary of the key points:
This study looked at whether a type of fasting called time-restricted eating (TRE) could help improve health in people with metabolic syndrome.
Metabolic syndrome is a group of conditions like high blood sugar, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol that increase the risk of heart disease and diabetes.
The researchers had two groups of people with metabolic syndrome:
1. One group received standard nutritional counseling. 2. The other group received nutritional counseling plus a personalized TRE program. This meant they could only eat during an 8-10 hour window each day.
After 3 months, the TRE group showed a small but meaningful improvement in their HbA1c (a measure of blood sugar control) compared to the standard counseling group.
The study was relatively short and relied on people reporting their own diet, so the results may have been affected by other factors. But the researchers concluded that the TRE program could be a helpful lifestyle intervention to modestly improve blood sugar regulation in people with metabolic syndrome.
Anything else is too much hassle, especially eating less.
i thought it would be common sense to eat less when you are overweight but the amount of people believing otherwise, at least on internet and on this part of the internet (male, around 30-40 years, good income, works in tech or sedentary job) is astonishing.
A good kick in the ass would work better than any pill.
You
Are
Saying
Is
Backed
By
Science
As far as I know, no one can legally force someone else to eat something he doesn't want to. It basically mean that if you're fat it's because you didn't put enough will.
I learned a lot from his book The Circadian Code.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38639542/