Conveniently characterizing people who point out somebody who is supporting fascism as "conveniently characterizing" means you don't actually have to consider if they are fascist or even know what fascism is.
Fascism is a somewhat hard to define mechanism. The rhetoric appears clearly fascist. Musk uses said rhetoric and supports the administration using the rhetoric.
Pointing out a person using fascist rhetoric and supporting an administration that is doing the same, convenient or otherwise, appears somewhat accurate.
This person resigned, and gave a reason, remaining respectful of the Royal Society's code of conduct. I don't see this as playground bullying at all. Doesn't hurt Musk, doesn't hurt the Royal Society.
8 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 26.5 ms ] threadConveniently characterizing people who point out somebody who is supporting fascism as "conveniently characterizing" means you don't actually have to consider if they are fascist or even know what fascism is.
Fascism is a somewhat hard to define mechanism. The rhetoric appears clearly fascist. Musk uses said rhetoric and supports the administration using the rhetoric.
Pointing out a person using fascist rhetoric and supporting an administration that is doing the same, convenient or otherwise, appears somewhat accurate.