I hope Amazon workers win this fight to do labour with some dignity and without being exploited. I know somebody who works for Amazon HR (US) and they say that hire and fire, along with union busting, is in "full-on brutal" mode.
The overwhelming majority of retail businesses use third party fulfillment. Amazon itself used to. It's clearly possible. Plus the website is retail, digital, production, publishing, and a cloud services provider.
> don’t pay another business for dealing with the inventory
What do you think UPS and FedEx does? Shipping is not instantaneous and most of it is logistics. Warehouses are often rented. Amazon produces very few physical products and most are on consignment anyways. What model are you imaginging?
> Sounds like it would result in less accountability and efficiency
To have multiple businesses competing for these deliveries? I'm not sure how you arrive at that conclusion.
> and an arbitrary line to draw.
As stated, they _used_ to do this, it's not at all arbitrary.
Fulfillment operations is not just delivery to the customer, or owning the warehouse. All the employees that work in the warehouse, move stuff from warehouse to warehouse or warehouse to store, are all part of fulfillment.
Amazon does not deliver to customers. They pay separate businesses (they call them delivery service partners) to deliver to customers:
I think it's pretty reasonable to assume "better working conditions", given the near infinite stories of Amazon abusing workers in fulfillment centers.
I think the confusion comes from the fact that the linked page is not a text article, its actually an AUTOPLAYING VIDEO for a small news station. There is not actual text content
17 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 55.3 ms ] threadSounds like it would result in less accountability and efficiency, and an arbitrary line to draw.
You doubt that which is easily verified?
> don’t pay another business for dealing with the inventory
What do you think UPS and FedEx does? Shipping is not instantaneous and most of it is logistics. Warehouses are often rented. Amazon produces very few physical products and most are on consignment anyways. What model are you imaginging?
> Sounds like it would result in less accountability and efficiency
To have multiple businesses competing for these deliveries? I'm not sure how you arrive at that conclusion.
> and an arbitrary line to draw.
As stated, they _used_ to do this, it's not at all arbitrary.
Amazon does not deliver to customers. They pay separate businesses (they call them delivery service partners) to deliver to customers:
https://hiring.amazon.com/job-opportunities/delivery-driver-...
https://logistics.amazon.com/
FedEx does the same thing with FedEx Ground:
https://www.buildagroundbiz.com/
Website appears to be for a Local TV Station. They are notorious for just showing videos.
It seems this happens quite often.
> (WFXR) – Amazon worker strike expected.