6 comments

[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 28.0 ms ] thread
Several things we could do but I could think of one pretty easy one, don't demand companies censor "misinformation" that later turns out to be true

Don't interfere in the doctor patient relationship

Incoming mass downvotes

Ideas were censored here on this form too. To start hackernews could admit the role they played in censorship. The people responsible should be replaced.
the hilariously imbecilic "wet market hypothesis" only ever existed because liberals refused to agree with Trump on anything, even simple conclusions on Covid origins

as soon as idiots started peddling the (weirdly racist) idea that Covid came out of Chinese people eating Pangolins, it was clear that TDS was a real and frightening thing

no surprise that there is no reporting on this in NYT or WaPo...can't confront readers with their own stupidity

Well the report just released now, so its possible they just don't have an article ready yet. I would be surprised if they didn't say anything about news this big by the end of the day.
Since we know the virus was man made are we allowed to ask if it was released on purpose?
How many on hackernews can admit they were wrong about this? I left the site when no one could admit this, even when it became obvious. Has anything changed here?