Ask HN: Why don't they remove the cookies (and hence the banners)
I get it if you're an ads-driven website
But why do agencies, municipalities, (government) railways or other non-ads driven websites need to have cookies, and hence the frustrating banners?
My hypothesis is they want to be "better safe than sorry" but maybe there are real marketing purposes behind it?
some examples: https://www.mckinsey.com https://www.london.gov.uk https://www.ns.nl (Dutch railways) https://www.britishmuseum.org
12 comments
[ 6.6 ms ] story [ 48.2 ms ] threadSo let's say that by default you have a light theme. If the user selects a dark theme, you need the cookie. Then my reading is that no banner would be necessary.
The right side is - why those bureaucrats are so stupid, short sighted and people hating that we have the frustrating banners even on harmless websites.
It's useless bureaucrats that scare companies so they don't want to waste time and money figuring out all the nuances and put themselves at risk of getting sued.