I wonder if there is a way, to gather this info separately from the government and publish results? Or at least publish an accuracy of the public numbers...
Definitely would violate state secrets laws. The government wants a monopoly on this kind of information and will prevent anyone else from just going out and collecting statistics/polling on their own. Look at the fit they rose when the American embassy published pollution sastitics for what they measured (which is only legal because the embassy is sovereign territory...the real reason why they block twitter!).
One of the problems that are being solved now was that the actual data to determine growth was made by local officials. There have apparenttly been some speculation as to whether they have been a little to eager to prove them selves and inflated the numbers.
The public should keep a suspicious eye on every stat published; only that way, we would notice the Libor scandal, 2008 mortgage related valuations, or a lot of countries from Argentina to Turkey playing with their major economic stat reporting such as inflation, GDP, foreign trade etc.
In the US, the government just openly changes the methodology, which is forgotten shortly after. Seems to work just as well as falsifying the stats, with none of the risk.
I'm not recommending Shadow Stats specifically - I have no idea how accurate or biased they are.
But there's a clear need for this information in order to do any kind of historical comparisons of things as basic as inflation and unemployment numbers.
Studies by Goldman Sachs and other institutions over the years have strongly suggested that Chinese statisticians smooth out the quarterly growth figures, underreporting growth during boom years and overstating growth during economic downturns.
So private corporations (who granted have their own agenda and biases) make assessments of economic numbers reported.
It would be surprising that there is not publicly available studies that report the general reliability of economic statistics reported by a country. It would even be interesting to reported statistics aggregated in a way that allows for easy comparison between numbers reported by different countries. Something like the Index of Economic freedom: http://www.heritage.org/index/default
(I am not an economist - so can't say I have done an extensive analysis of available sources...)
9 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 51.3 ms ] threadCould be an interesting space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowstats.com
I'm not recommending Shadow Stats specifically - I have no idea how accurate or biased they are.
But there's a clear need for this information in order to do any kind of historical comparisons of things as basic as inflation and unemployment numbers.
http://www.economist.com/node/8733747?story_id=8733747
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Analysis_Techniques_for_F...
The NY Times reported last month that
Studies by Goldman Sachs and other institutions over the years have strongly suggested that Chinese statisticians smooth out the quarterly growth figures, underreporting growth during boom years and overstating growth during economic downturns.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/23/business/global/chinese-da...
So private corporations (who granted have their own agenda and biases) make assessments of economic numbers reported.
It would be surprising that there is not publicly available studies that report the general reliability of economic statistics reported by a country. It would even be interesting to reported statistics aggregated in a way that allows for easy comparison between numbers reported by different countries. Something like the Index of Economic freedom: http://www.heritage.org/index/default
(I am not an economist - so can't say I have done an extensive analysis of available sources...)
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-28/markets/30564...
This is to fudge the figures so that it looks as though the province is creating electricity.
"Chinese Data Mask Depth of Slowdown, Executives Say": http://www.cnbc.com/id/47929035
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/06/06/china-coal-pilin...
EDIT: Found direct assertion at CNBC