My Bootstrapped startup webapp would like beta testers and feedback
My first attempt at a startup could use some beta testers - http://padseeker.com/accounts/new<p>Would love feedback from fellow hacker news members. Long story short padseeker is like weebly for real estate. It's mainly residential rental properties. It still needs work but I would love to hear from fellow developers what you think. Please make the feedback honest, and if necessary brutal.
14 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 9.4 ms ] threadYour logo looks very similar to dropbox's except the color of course. Not sure if this would be a problem later on if and when you hit it big.
Also, I tried to click on "sing up" without entering anything just to see what happens. The list of error message is too many and redundant.Do you really need to say "Password missing password?"
Password doesn't match confirmation
Password is too short (minimum is 6 characters)
Password Missing password
Password is too short (minimum is 4 characters)
Password doesn't match confirmation
Email can't be blank
Email should look like an email address.
Password confirmation is too short (minimum is 4 characters)
My honest feedback, not much for me to even consider signing up. Put more info about what padseeker does for me as a user?
Seems pretty straightforward and I was able to figure it out easily - you sign up, set up buildings, add units, publish a site, and then voila people come to your site and search, request building units for rent or lease or whatever.
However I suspect your average building landlord or property manager might have a harder time figuring it out. Lots of tabs, lots of fields to fill out, and the navigation is a bit clunky.
In summary - I got the crux of the service and it seems pretty solid for an MVP. The design and ux need a lot of work and your landing page should do a better job of summarizing what the web site does.
Cheers
I'm glad you found it straightforward - that is the most important thing. I agree that the average landlord will have a few issues. It needs lots more help icons/popovers (via bootstrap). Also it makes sense to hide some of the tabs until a user has data in there. The tabs are clunky, something I may be able to improve using bootstrap.
The biggest consensus is the landing page sucks. Not that I am hearing it I would agree - but I think it was a blind spot since I've focused on the code and functionality for so long. I have my list of priorities now, and improving the landing page is now #1.
I noticed you picked some of the earlier templates I developed, I either need to improve them or push them out. I really do appreciate the feedback. Thanks for giving it a shot, I will definitely work on the landing page.
The landing page might work, but for site templates that could be a potential issue even if I pay for a theme. The concern I am selling something, as the prices for themes go up when you resell someone else's work.
"Build your own website for your rental property business in 10 minutes" Does that sound descriptive enough?