9 comments

[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 31.4 ms ] thread
The comments on this article on the WaPo website are scorching.

Do major papers read their comment sections? Like maybe an intern skims them? Or do they do sophisticated sentiment analysis? Since the Bezos decision to not endorse Harris, WaPo's comment sections have been extraordinarily negative to my eye, with a ton of comments about Bezos mandating particular viewpoints and slants.

Apparently they forgot to permanently shut down the comment feature. Hopefully no one will remind them.
We all know how the editorial decisions are made this year...
And did nothing about it. They’re the worst in the industry in terms of claim denials.
Oh I'm sure they hired some social media reputation managers to spread lies, but they were never going to change negative behaviors that were profitable.
It's notable that his concern was not that his company's policies were killing thousands of people, but that those deaths resulted in a "negative image".
Is it possible to be concerned about multiple things as a CEO?
If only he worried about UnitedHealth's negative deeds instead...