Show HN: Autonomous AI agents that monitor the stock market for you (decodeinvesting.com)
How it works: Tell our AI Assistant what you want to monitor, and it creates a project for our team of autonomous AI Agents. You'll get notifications (email + app) when significant events matching your criteria are detected. For short-term projects, you'll be notified when your analysis is ready.
Behind the scenes: When you give the AI Assistant a request to monitor an entity (like a stock or group of stocks), an AI Project Manager plans the project and breaks the project down into manageable tasks. These tasks run asynchronously - some recurring (hourly/daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly), others one-time.
Example prompts you can try: Long-term monitoring: - "Monitor Apple stock and notify me of any important events and red flags" - "Monitor Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Meta stock. Notify me if any of them start trending toward being undervalued"
Short-term analysis: - "Create a project to analyze the last 30 earnings calls for Tesla, spot trends, and how the business has evolved over time"
You can track the progress of all tasks as the AI Agents work in the background.
Try it here: https://decodeinvesting.com/chat
This is still an early version - we're actively improving it based on feedback. Would love to hear what you think and what features you'd want to see next!
Previously shared our AI-powered Stock Market Research Analyst: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41156478
32 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 86.1 ms ] threadHow are you determining red flags ?
Will an LLM be running every x hours analyzing news, so I can give very specific things to look for ?
You can specify the red flags, or the LLM will specify them for you don't include them.
You can also specify how often you want the LLM to monitor things for you.
If the application is meant for retail, how do you plan on funding the project? Answering this question would better illuminate the stakeholder's incentives and if they align with users' interests.
Both retail and institutions can also use for our SAAS solution. We don't share our user data with third parties.
I do review the AI interactions for the following reasons:
- To ensure the AI system (AI assistants and agents) meets expectations.
- Safety: To ensure the AI system is not generating false or misleading information.
- To understand how the AI system is performing and how to improve it.
Just automates the research that users would do manually.
If you actually had a system that could detect when a stock was "undervalued" you should just trade directly on that system instead of selling it to consumers. This is pretty clearly scammy/predatory towards retail investors.
Here some examples:
- Market cap is less than book value.
- Market cap is less than free cash flow x 8
There are other ways, but these are some examples. Being undervalued doesn't mean its a good company, the trick is knowing why its undervalued and if that valuation is justified.
If it’s justified, then it’s not undervalued.
Everything you described above is also just wrong and you should please stop encouraging uneducated retail investors to believe anything that fits these heuristics is “objectively undervalued”.
> - Market cap is less than free cash flow x 8
Lol. "Objectively".
40 questions to Saturday just sounds ridiculous.
I feel like on this trajectory my broker is soon going to be pretending my trailing stop is an AI agent monitoring when to get out of the trade "in the background".
> "Investment adviser" means any person who, for compensation, engages in the business of advising others, either directly or through publications or writings, as to the value of securities or as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities, or who, for compensation and as part of a regular business, issues or promulgates analyses or reports concerning securities...
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1878/pdf/COMPS-187...
> any person
The AI defense.
However, governments in thw US love to whitewash liability so this is just academic.
I'd bet there's a person somewhere that receives money in exchange for sharing the AI's analysis, which would fall squarely into the second half of the definition:
> [any person] who, for compensation and as part of a regular business, issues or promulgates analyses or reports concerning securities...
Capturing data, feeding it to an LLM, and hoping it actually does comparisons properly?
Is the LLM writing code that is being executed for each query or job?
Otherwise, all I am seeing here (and based on your comments saying "LLM") it just appears this grabs data, gives it to an LLM, and "magic output"