Has it learned a strategy that you can actually explain?
Do you have good reason to believe that the outperformance is more than random chance?
In principle, what is your thesis for the existence of something in the data that could be learned which reliably leads to outperformance? I.e., where did the "indicators" come from, and why should they have any potential to function as such?
BTW, something seems to have gotten cut off in the README here:
> Where (i) is the strategy's rank. Please keep in mind that the strategy's rank
And this is just awful:
> Benefits of Dynamic Ranking
> Quickly adapts to changing market conditions.
> Prioritizes high-performing algorithms.
> Balances risk while maximizing potential returns.
That's three different ways of saying "it's dynamic" and/or "it accomplishes the goal".
4 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 20.6 ms ] threadHow are you handling slippage?
Do you have good reason to believe that the outperformance is more than random chance?
In principle, what is your thesis for the existence of something in the data that could be learned which reliably leads to outperformance? I.e., where did the "indicators" come from, and why should they have any potential to function as such?
BTW, something seems to have gotten cut off in the README here:
> Where (i) is the strategy's rank. Please keep in mind that the strategy's rank
And this is just awful:
> Benefits of Dynamic Ranking
> Quickly adapts to changing market conditions.
> Prioritizes high-performing algorithms.
> Balances risk while maximizing potential returns.
That's three different ways of saying "it's dynamic" and/or "it accomplishes the goal".