Show HN: Willpayforthis.com – Gathering posts about what people will pay for (willpayforthis.com) 16 points by bickett 1y ago ↗ HN When people have a pain point they'd like solved, I find that many of them resort to posting a Tweet about it. I made these posts easy to find.
[–] reconvene1290 1y ago ↗ In reality, people won’t pay for things they say they will; it’s cheap rhetoric to try to get maintainers to add their niche feature.Nice idea though, maybe add some more data sources to increase confidence in data (and hopefully prove me wrong). [–] bickett 1y ago ↗ Ok, I’ll try to!
[–] CaffeineLD50 1y ago ↗ Isn't that what mechanical turk and so on are for? [–] potatoman22 1y ago ↗ Curious -- how would you use mechanical turk for this?
[–] sky2224 1y ago ↗ A pre-order for a basic web-scraper... you're joking, right? [–] [deleted] 1y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] Kwpolska 1y ago ↗ I doubt people will pay for willpayforthis.com. They could just type "will pay" into Xitter search themselves. [–] bickett 1y ago ↗ 15 preorders in the last few weeks! The product will be much more than just an advanced search.
[–] bickett 1y ago ↗ 15 preorders in the last few weeks! The product will be much more than just an advanced search.
[–] anthropodie 1y ago ↗ I think people who want to view ideas should pay instead of people who submit ideas. [–] sam_lowry_ 1y ago ↗ I would make paid voting.10$/10€ 10£ and enough hassle to show real interest.
[–] sam_lowry_ 1y ago ↗ I would make paid voting.10$/10€ 10£ and enough hassle to show real interest.
[–] mgl 1y ago ↗ I’m surprised to see the previous six comments being negative.There’s nothing wrong with building a simple, potentially useful service and charging for it upfront.This is actually a great example of how you should test such ideas.Congratulations - and the market validation journey has just begun. Cheers! [–] sky2224 1y ago ↗ I'm one of the negative comments. It's just how it comes off. Putting on the front of the site that this will find you "market-validated ideas" just rubs me the wrong way. [–] bickett 1y ago ↗ Thank you for saying that
[–] sky2224 1y ago ↗ I'm one of the negative comments. It's just how it comes off. Putting on the front of the site that this will find you "market-validated ideas" just rubs me the wrong way.
15 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 48.6 ms ] threadNice idea though, maybe add some more data sources to increase confidence in data (and hopefully prove me wrong).
10$/10€ 10£ and enough hassle to show real interest.
There’s nothing wrong with building a simple, potentially useful service and charging for it upfront.
This is actually a great example of how you should test such ideas.
Congratulations - and the market validation journey has just begun. Cheers!