Having used a TP-Link ethernet over power device in the past, this is quite concerning. Most devices like this do not have an adequate replacement from domestic or allied manufacturers. Is there no government agency examining and reporting on these frequently purchased electronics?
That he's anti-establishment or anti-west, exactly the type of person who would make such a comment? I'm not sure how that's supposed to be an interesting observation. It's like being surprised that someone who writes a pro-trump comment also espouses other conservative talking points in their comment history.
I think dang should add this specific example of AI to guidelines, in point "Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, AI content or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting."
It only mentions routers and not APs. I am extremely pleased with my tp-link Omada WiFi setup with self hosted controller in a docker image. after over a decade using mikrotik and ubiquiti products I don’t think I would go back for WiFi, and I would certainly be inclined to give a tp link router a look if it’s as polished and capable as their WiFi products.
TP Link “ which dominate approximately 65% of the U.S. router market for small businesses and homes (Allconnect)”
This appear to be more about protecting US market share and less about national security. Netgear/linksys etc cannot compete with price against TP Link.
38 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 97.3 ms ] threadMaybe Netgear/Mikrotik/Ubiquity/Thompson/D-Link/Frtizbox or someone else would edge in.
This appear to be more about protecting US market share and less about national security. Netgear/linksys etc cannot compete with price against TP Link.