> While 41% of those surveyed said they support efforts to roll back diversity initiatives, the majority — nearly six in 10 — either oppose those efforts or are unsure about them.
Why group the unsure with supporters? It would be equally valid to group them with the opposed. It would be interesting to see numbers for each response given, but the article dishonestly omits them - the asymmetrically aggregated data is all we get.
That is in addition to the opening paragraph that conflates being fine with something, with not having been personally hindered by it. By that standard, Americans are fine with ISIS..
Because it is an a priori based on... "vibes" and a lot of hearsay (from the loudest voices).
And "nearly 6 in 10" (so, closer to 50/50?) is not a big majority. Just need that a few thousand people change their mind to reverse which side is the "majority". (Note the margin of error is not mentioned)
I do not care what other think about it. I care what God's words say.
History, as such, turns out to be man groping forward, killing his fellow man in an effort to attain a form of government where he will not have to kill his fellow man. -Peter S. Ruckman" http://crn.hopto.org/#kjv
3 comments
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 16.7 ms ] threadWhy group the unsure with supporters? It would be equally valid to group them with the opposed. It would be interesting to see numbers for each response given, but the article dishonestly omits them - the asymmetrically aggregated data is all we get.
That is in addition to the opening paragraph that conflates being fine with something, with not having been personally hindered by it. By that standard, Americans are fine with ISIS..
Because it is an a priori based on... "vibes" and a lot of hearsay (from the loudest voices).
And "nearly 6 in 10" (so, closer to 50/50?) is not a big majority. Just need that a few thousand people change their mind to reverse which side is the "majority". (Note the margin of error is not mentioned)
History, as such, turns out to be man groping forward, killing his fellow man in an effort to attain a form of government where he will not have to kill his fellow man. -Peter S. Ruckman" http://crn.hopto.org/#kjv