Ask HN: What is the software startup environment in your city like?
After reading the Berlin thread (edit: and the recent Canada thread), it made me curious about what others thought about the software startup environment in the places they're located in. Where are you? What things would be useful to for people who would consider starting up there? Is it nascent, growing, non-existent? Who are the movers and shakers? Particular industry focus? We obviously hear a lot about the big dogs like Silicon Valley and Alley, but it'd be interesting to know about other places from those most active/experienced with them.
Not looking for anything with statistical rigor (though that's welcome too), just subjective experiences and fun anecdotes.
As I'm in Silicon Alley, I won't say much about it other than being thrilled to see my home turn into such a great place for software. Growing up in Brooklyn, I would never have imagined what it has turned out to be/is turning into.
8 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 28.5 ms ] threadhttp://a2geeks.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=18481175
(I worked for 4 years in A2, right next to Dug, and apart from everything I have to say about A2 I wouldn't hesitate to go work for him at Duo if I had an offer).
So to make that concrete, an unscientific comparison of Chicago (where I am) to SFBA (where I worked for ~4 years):
* Talent is cheaper in Chicago by high-single-digit percentage points
* Talent is more abundantly available in Chicago. There are (obviously) fewer overall candidates, but the competition for them is much lower.
* If you're in a specialized field (as we are), it's even better: the SFBA talent competition seems most intense for high-premium specialists, and markets like Chicago have disproportionately fewer opportunities for those specialists.
* Housing is significantly cheaper and thus dollar-for-dollar better and more convenient than SFBA.
* Public transportion as vastly superior in Chicago than in SFBA, which increases both the effective availability of housing (more neighborhoods are easily commutable) but also overall quality of life (if you want a tree-lined street with kids, you got it; if you want a 1 block walk to your favorite bar, you also probably got it).
* Much less "networking" in Chicago than in SFBA. I've met a lot of Chicago startup "luminaries" for various reasons, but can't think of any event where I could do so reliably, unlike SF.
* The startup population is growing in proportion with the nationwide startup population. This is in contrast to NYC, which is growing disproportionately fast. Our big names are Groupon, 37s, Grubhub. We've got a small number of local YC companies.
* I'm a bad person to ask about the funding market but it seems anemic compared to SFBA or NYC or even Seattle. This is a better place to bootstrap.
* I also think it's an easier place to bootstrap, because Chicago has a large number of businesses, and more diversity in business size (from a large population of approachable stable small businesses to a large population of major enterprises) and vertical (trading, banking, pharma, law, insurance, food, hospitality). I think this is a stark contrast to SFBA which, if you're not freemiuming to the whole Internet as your strategy, has an "ice cubes to Inuits" vibe to it.
* Way more available office space, both in the Loop (downtown) and on the north and near-west side (if you want to be SOMA-trendy about your company).
How do you feel that Chicago rates on "serendipity creation" (which I meant to ask in the OP, and seems like we could classify it separately from regular "networking")? Does it feel like a place where you can walk into non-official/industry events like coffeeshop/co-working-esque places and find collaborators? In a similar vein, do you see geographical clustering of startups, with the attendant bump-into-people at the deli counter effects?
It's an enjoyable location :}