Ask HN: Why are banks charging so many fees for accounts and cards?
I'm trying to understand why banks still charge account fees and card fees, especially when they don't seem to make significant profits from them.
I started a fintech company focused on banking for luxury deals and worked with banking partners, so I've seen a lot of the industry from the inside. Still, I can't wrap my head around this.
Why are these fees still prevalent? Are they just a relic of legacy banking systems, or is there more to it? The scary thing is banks don't even make alot of money on that. So why still charge them.
81 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 149 ms ] threadIt reminds me of freezing your credit (you know, the thing that makes it a lot harder to get your life ruined with identity theft (in the US)). This used to cost about $10, each time, and I believe you had to send a letter with a check to each credit bureau.
Now? It's free, and you can do it on-demand online (although they all try to upcharge you into buying their stupid credit score nonsense every single time, which should be illegal). It's curious how this used to cost money, and then a lot of scandals happened, and either laws were passed or threatened to be passed, and now something pro-consumer that should have always been free... is free. And Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion are still making craptons of money.
The astute reader might ask why they ever charged for this in the first place. It couldn't be that they needed to, because they aren't now, and the universe hasn't imploded. So the only explanation is that they did it because they could, because it locked up something people needed to do behind a paywall, and was profitable.
It's not true that business costs are entirely fictional and consumer willingness to get hosed is the only input to their pricing models.
Likely they do it because they can and it's a vendor lock-in mindset from their customers. People have banked with them their whole life or their parents banked with them etc.. so they feel like this is the better deal. I've seen credit unions doing this. Credit unions talk about how great their services are and how much better it is to be with a credit union but I see them charge all kinds of horrible fees as well. It's also much more difficult to get a hold of someone 24/7 with a credit union if you have banking needs.
I think there's still a lot of legacy banking attitudes like you need to go into an office and sit down and talk to somebody. Which usually necessitates you having to take a day off of work because banker's hours are called bankers hours for a reason. I myself choose to bank with someone who will be available on my schedule not on their schedule.
But there are several national banks that have similar no fee accounts. Just looking around online at some deals and the one that stands out to me is really good deal is Charles Schwab offers a no fee account. Yes you have to open a brokerage account but that also has no minimums with it as well. Plus it seems they have unlimited ATM rebates.
Some of it may come down to your needs as I haven't had the need to access a local branch in many decades now. I don't deal in large sums of cash and needs a deposit it. I primarily look for a bank that has excellent online access and telephone access.
How do you pay to operate your business without income? You need to pay for people, infra, and other costs of banking provided. The only model that works for that is postal banking or deposit accounts issued by the central bank, where your nation state offers banking as a utility in some fashion.
[1] https://www.kalzumeus.com/2019/6/26/how-brokerages-make-mone...
Easy - VC funding :P
Since people are resistant to paying monthly account fees, banks will have to hide the fees in ways that you won't immediately notice. In a way, customers are deceiving themselves. If they just paid the monthly fees, the cost of their bank account would be highly predictable.
I'm curious what else is under your "perks" umbrella.
If you want a checking account with no minimums try Ally. EFT payments are also free. You will have to pay for checks however.
I don't use checks often but have to buy a box in order to have >0.
This one is TD but the others all charge the same. Why compete when you can collude?
https://www.td.com/ca/en/personal-banking/products/bank-acco...It is also pretty much impossible to keep precisely $4,000 in your account because of the lumpiness of day-to-day inflows (paycheques) and outflows (bills). If you keep say $10,000 in your chequing account to (a) avoid the $16.95/fee, and (b) provide a buffer against unexpected expenses, then the breakeven return on your money is $203.40 / $10,000 = a paltry 2.03%.
Wait, its 0.000% on $4,000
High interest, indeed!
This is the same board where people will tell you to charge $10,000 a week for cloud consulting because it's "value-based pricing", and to steadily increase the per-user costs for your dime-a-dozen CRUD web app "because people will pay it". Amazing.
Banks do it because they can, buddy. It's wealth extraction, and if you aren't the one doing the extracting, you're the one being extracted.
I also suppose that charging a small amount regularly is a garbage collection mechanism. If you stopped paying attention to your empty account, it will run into negative, and eventually be closed due to that.
1. Payday loan tier. It's very extractive and uses lots of fees and interest because getting a cut of whatever money is there now is all that matters.
2. "Normal" tier. There basically aren't fees for typical services, everything is paid for indirectly via interest rates and card fees or marketing other services. The banks I've used since the 2000s have all been like this.
3. "Premium" tier. At this level there's usually a fee to keep out the "riffraff," like with most AmEx.
Do some normal tier providers have fees? I've seen credit unions where there are fees if you don't meet some threshold of services or usage. Or with some non CU accounts where there's a fee if balances don't stay above a certain level. But that's about it. I've also seen I think once or twice set ups where you had to opt in to things like free overdraft protection, but could get charged for it if you don't. But that seem like the fringes, not the norm.
You charge fees to get money.
Banks are there to make profits.
You say that banks don't make much money off of it, but maybe your idea of "much money" and mine are different.
In my country, it is reported that bank fees make up approximately 5% of bank revenue, and I'm reasonably sure we have less fees than others. I don't know what business or country you're in, but there's a pretty good guess your country takes in more money in fees, and earning a marginal 5% on anything is not chump change.
May I humbly suggest that your premise is wrong. They ARE significant sources of revenue and profit and banks charge them because they are in the business of generating profits.
The answer's exactly the same as from the famous bank robber who eventually confessed as to his motivation for living the high life on ill-gotten gains using the same institutions:
"Because that's where the money is."
I have two bank accounts and 5 credit cards - no fees. And I'm not a rich SV programmer either. If I was, I'd probably get one of those fancy cards that does have fees.
Just as software and internet also has a mixture of free to use, once off, subscription, usage metering and fixed cost revenue, so too does banking and credit services vary their fee revenue structure and sources for its various financial services and products.
It's very hard to make universal statements to how these are structured, but about the only thing I think I can say is that if you aren't paying fees, the commercial entity must be aiming to make revenue off of you being a customer in some way. Some savvy customers can get services with a net positive value for free, but the business at large scale is going to try to extract what value it can.
It's hard to give a universal statement on price structuring, but generally fees can help squeeze revenue out of sticky customers, customers who need your services, customers who do not provide enough net capital or volume-based revenue to cover your costs.
You can also use fees to explicitly target or select for particular users. For instance, in some money and credit markets or markets which offer various costly rewards you can sometimes split your customer base into good revenue sources and costly freeloaders. A fee structure can even help signal or self-select these costly customers out of a product or identify them for your other product lines.
Yes, credit cards make money from merchant fees and banks make money from lending your money out.
Two other thoughts, one speculative/general and one where I know of what I speak:
If you make most of your income off a small group of your customers, then it’s wise the charge some nominal fee on the other customers to get them to breakeven unit economics. (That holds in most any industry, not just finance. Consider the endless think pieces on the problems caused by a high proportion of free users at zoom and Dropbox.) No, you’re not “making big profits” from them, but the point is to make sure your customers aren’t adversely selected. That can mean, “let’s still make something off the people who pay their credit card bill every month.” It can also mean, “overdrafts create manual work in our back office; let’s make sure they pay for themselves and aren’t correlated to our profit margin on the real business, which is lending.”
Area I know more about: for credit cards in particular, don’t underestimate what the annual fee does for the issuer. The psychology of it for the consumer is huge. People will cancel accounts they’re not using, sure. That helps, because forcing unused accounts closed can draw regulatory headaches. But consumers also consider the card more valuable and may be more loyal to it if it costs as much as their Netflix subscription each year. The issuer is making money on other sources—interest, interchange, travel portals, etc. The fee is, for the right type of customer, a kind of marketing device.
We have five Delta cards between my wife and myself that we only make one charge a year on for the hotel credits. Just by having the card, we get a buy one get one free plane ticket good for anywhere in the US, Mexico, Central America or the Caribbean. That more than pays the annual fee.
We have over a dozen trips planned this year and we took over a dozen each year since mid 2021. It’s a hint of ours.
I use Schwab for personal banking. They are excellent and return ATM free each month. Been using them for years and don’t think I’ve ever paid a fee.
Likewise for business banking I use Mercury and they’ve been great too.
Banks are an odd business. You are basically guaranteed some income but the margins are slim and lots of regulations. Despite all the bad behavior they are probably one of if not the closest watched businesses by gov regulators.
That's how you get an economy in which banks are too systematically important to fail and therefore must always be bailed out, no matter what.
One possible explanation is inertia: many people stick with their bank because it’s familiar. It may be the bank their parents used, or they’ve been loyal customers for years and assume they’re getting the best deal. Unfortunately, this loyalty often overlooks better opportunities elsewhere. Interestingly, credit unions—despite promoting themselves as customer-centric and fee-conscious—can also impose excessive fees, challenging their claimed superiority.
Credit unions are notorious for limited official working hours, which can be frustrating when urgent banking needs arise. Accessibility in banking has become a priority, especially for those who need customer service outside traditional “banker’s hours.” The idea of physically visiting a branch, often during inconvenient weekday hours, feels increasingly outdated in today’s digital-first world.
For me, a bank needs to be accessible on my schedule—not the other way around. The ability to resolve issues or access services anytime is essential, and plenty of financial institutions cater to these preferences without restrictive fees or antiquated processes. Customers should embrace this freedom of choice and find banks that value their time and priorities, not the other way around.
Do we want to make more money? Or less money?
Where do you get the idea they don't make significant profits from them?
May they go to hell.
Also, traditionally it was technically expensive to calculate a bunch of fees for every transaction and core banking systems have had quite complicated rules processing engines which were damn slow. Sometimes it was more feasible to skip a fee than take the burden. I'm not in the industry anymore but I suppose this has been changed and fees becoming the new driver.
Basically most of the Fintech was born on bank's inability to perform a lot of simple calculations and react to the market fast. The gap could be closing.
My wife and I fly a lot as a hobby. We’ve been averaging over a dozen trips per year since mid 2021.
We pay $3400 in Annual fees between 9 cards. We get around $4900 worth of benefits between those cards between Clear credits, companion flight passes (buy one get one free), hotel credits and various other credits.
That’s not including Delta Platinum Medallion status that gives us free automatic seat upgrades and lounge access for free food and drinks while waiting at the airport.
Of course we also get points toward flights and hotels for spending on them.
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research-repor...