> An open model is free speech, therefore constitutionally protected
I think you fundamentally misunderstand the era we are in.
Birthright citizenship is also constitutionally protected apparently, and this is arguably more central to the USA's historical self-perception but that isn't stopping Trump who believes he is acting in the USA's self-interest by blocking it.
US also has valid, binding trade agreements with Canada and Mexico but that isn't stopping him from saying he will impose >= 20% tariffs or similar within the next week because again Trump believes he is acting in the USA's self-interest.
Since the article only mentioned 5 countries, the full list of the 18 countries with unlimited access to chips is: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom [0]
8 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 24.1 ms ] thread2. Politicians don’t follow HN and don’t care about specific models like R1
If you mean Chinese models in general, then maybe if it poses economic harm and doesn’t break rule 1
I think you fundamentally misunderstand the era we are in.
Birthright citizenship is also constitutionally protected apparently, and this is arguably more central to the USA's historical self-perception but that isn't stopping Trump who believes he is acting in the USA's self-interest by blocking it.
US also has valid, binding trade agreements with Canada and Mexico but that isn't stopping him from saying he will impose >= 20% tariffs or similar within the next week because again Trump believes he is acting in the USA's self-interest.
This is a Biden-era restriction that has nothing specific about Switzerland in it.
[0]: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-15/subtitle-B/chapter-VII...