7 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 32.8 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
Previously (+2 others)

(52 points, 1 day ago, 5 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42979187

(55 points, 22 hours ago, 5 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42980445

(20 points, 19 hours ago, 8 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42981120

(16 points, 17 hours ago, 4 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42981756

(30 points, 13 hours ago, 6 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42982964

It's a contentious issue, the oldest submission has been flagged & vouched a few times now.

[flagged]
It’s also literally hacker related. It doesn’t stretch the guidelines like other political submissions.
It's not that it's offtopic by politicness or whatever, it's that it's a followup detail of a story that's already had a couple of pretty big discussions. So a way to think about it is 'is this new bit of info going to produce a meaningfully different/interesting discussion compared to the one we just had'. It's not hard to see how many people might conclude 'no'.