This is significant in that the Fed underpins every financial system in the world. It IS audited, so this instead is likely a prelude for attempting to end the Fed's independence.
The news is covering these maneuvers as if things like the Federal budget were not already publicly released. Detailed expenses of the Federal Reserve are public.
I always wonder how this works in the courts, at some point it becomes absurd to by into "Well they said he is just a white house employee, like the chef ..." meanwhile every public statement, even Trump outright saying he runs DODGE in plain English is out there. These aren't misstatements, it's very clear in their own words what these people's roles are and it's in direct conflict with their legal arguments.
Supposedly that's what judges are for. Concepts like beneficial ownership prevent lawyers from making nonsense arguments. Flooding the zone may work on the press and public, but courts are supposed to cut through the crap.
Interesting. Let's how the market will react. Yesterday I read this comment by @kasey_junk:
>He’ll get to the Fed. But it won’t be overnight. The administration will start messaging it and choreographing the change long enough before so it won’t spook Wall Street. [0]
10 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 34.0 ms ] threadAudits: https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/audited-annual-fi...
"Well now that depends on what the definition of the word is [employee] is."
>He’ll get to the Fed. But it won’t be overnight. The administration will start messaging it and choreographing the change long enough before so it won’t spook Wall Street. [0]
It feels sooner than expected tbqh.
[0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43101200