AI-generated JIT compilers from interpreters: Are we there yet? 3 points by protocontrol 1y ago ↗ HN Have you seen someone already using generative AI to automatically generate optimized JIT compiler frontends from interpreter definitions?
[–] johndoe0815 1y ago ↗ I see no reason for any sort of AI to be applied here.There's an interesting guide on converting an interpreter into a static binary translator: https://gtoal.com/sbt/It would be great to see this expanded into a JIT compiler (using a generic translated code management/caching and optimization framework). [–] protocontrol 1y ago ↗ In a world where AI has crept into virtually every activity, it is hard to believe that AI cannot help in compiler generation.Why would the field of JIT meta-compilers be exempt from AI?
[–] protocontrol 1y ago ↗ In a world where AI has crept into virtually every activity, it is hard to believe that AI cannot help in compiler generation.Why would the field of JIT meta-compilers be exempt from AI?
2 comments
[ 2.1 ms ] story [ 16.7 ms ] threadThere's an interesting guide on converting an interpreter into a static binary translator: https://gtoal.com/sbt/
It would be great to see this expanded into a JIT compiler (using a generic translated code management/caching and optimization framework).
Why would the field of JIT meta-compilers be exempt from AI?