6 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 25.6 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
Honest question. How does this reconcile with the idea of states rights that has been promoted by republicans and the Supreme Court (as of late)?
Rhetoric often has nothing at all to do with what a party actually does.

They also claim to be the party of fiscal responsibility and the pro-economic-growth party, but we've got at least 45 years of history that make it look like neither of those are really true—based on the data, they're the party you elect if you want the economy to do worse and the deficit to get bigger. Like, if what actually happens when they govern was what you had to go on, not what they say, that's definitely what you'd conclude.